Assessment of Cardiac Lead Perforation: Comparison Among Chest Radiography, Transthoracic Echocardiography and Electrocardiography-gated Contrast-enhanced Cardiac CT-Reference-Cited by-全球学者库

Assessment of Cardiac Lead Perforation: Comparison Among Chest Radiography, Transthoracic Echocardiography and Electrocardiography-gated Contrast-enhanced Cardiac CT

Published:2018-07-17 Issue:2 Volume:29 Page:963-974
ISSN:0938-7994
Container-title:European Radiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur Radiol

Author:

Zhang Xiang,Zheng Chushan,Wang Peiwei,Wang Dongye,Huang Boshui,Li Guozhao,Hu Huijun,Yang Zehong,Duan Xiaohui,Zheng Shaoxin,Liu Pinming,Wang Jingfeng,Shen Jun^ORCID

Funder

Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

The Elite Young Scholars Program of Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-018-5633-6/fulltext.html

Reference25 articles.

1. Todd D, Bongiorni MG, Hernandez-Madrid A et al (2014) Standards for device implantation and follow-up: personnel, equipment, and facilities: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association Survey. Europace 16:1236–1239. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu209

2. European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Brignole M et al (2013) 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Europace 15:1070–1118. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut206