Author:
Fontaine Sylvain,Gargiulo Floriana,Dubois Michel,Tubaro Paola
Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) shows a spectacular ability of insertion inside a variety of disciplines which use it for scientific advancements and which sometimes improve it for their conceptual and methodological needs. According to the transverse science framework originally conceived by Shinn and Joerges, AI can be seen as an instrument which is progressively acquiring a universal character through its diffusion across science. In this paper we address empirically one aspect of this diffusion, namely the penetration of AI into a specific field of research. Taking neuroscience as a case study, we conduct a scientometric analysis of the development of AI in this field. We especially study the temporal egocentric citation network around the articles included in this literature, their represented journals and their authors linked together by a temporal collaboration network. We find that AI is driving the constitution of a particular disciplinary ecosystem in neuroscience which is distinct from other subfields, and which is gathering atypical scientific profiles who are coming from neuroscience or outside it. Moreover we observe that this AI community in neuroscience is socially confined in a specific subspace of the neuroscience collaboration network, which also publishes in a small set of dedicated journals that are mostly active in AI research. According to these results, the diffusion of AI in a discipline such as neuroscience didn’t really challenge its disciplinary orientations but rather induced the constitution of a dedicated socio-cognitive environment inside this field.
Funder
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Andler D (1990) Connexionnisme et cognition: À la recherche des bonnes questions. Rev Synth 111(1–2):95–127
2. Arencibia-Jorge R, Vega-Almeida RL, Jiménez Andrade JL, Carrillo-Calvet H (2022) Evolution and multidisciplinarity of artificial intelligence research. Scientometrics 127(2):1–20
3. Baruffaldi S, van Beuzekom B, Dernis H, Harhoff D, Rao N, Rosenfeld D, Squicciarini M (2020) Identifying and measuring developments in artificial intelligence: making the impossible possible. (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers)
4. Bianchini S, Müller M, Pelletier P (2022) Artificial intelligence in science: an emerging general method of invention. Res Policy 51(10)
5. Cardon D, Cointet J-P, Mazières A (2018) Neurons spike back. The invention of inductive machines and the artificial intelligence controversy (L. Carey–Libbrecht, Trans.). Réseaux , 211(5), 173–220