Epistemic integration and social segregation of AI in neuroscience

Author:

Fontaine Sylvain,Gargiulo Floriana,Dubois Michel,Tubaro Paola

Abstract

AbstractIn recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) shows a spectacular ability of insertion inside a variety of disciplines which use it for scientific advancements and which sometimes improve it for their conceptual and methodological needs. According to the transverse science framework originally conceived by Shinn and Joerges, AI can be seen as an instrument which is progressively acquiring a universal character through its diffusion across science. In this paper we address empirically one aspect of this diffusion, namely the penetration of AI into a specific field of research. Taking neuroscience as a case study, we conduct a scientometric analysis of the development of AI in this field. We especially study the temporal egocentric citation network around the articles included in this literature, their represented journals and their authors linked together by a temporal collaboration network. We find that AI is driving the constitution of a particular disciplinary ecosystem in neuroscience which is distinct from other subfields, and which is gathering atypical scientific profiles who are coming from neuroscience or outside it. Moreover we observe that this AI community in neuroscience is socially confined in a specific subspace of the neuroscience collaboration network, which also publishes in a small set of dedicated journals that are mostly active in AI research. According to these results, the diffusion of AI in a discipline such as neuroscience didn’t really challenge its disciplinary orientations but rather induced the constitution of a dedicated socio-cognitive environment inside this field.

Funder

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Andler D (1990) Connexionnisme et cognition: À la recherche des bonnes questions. Rev Synth 111(1–2):95–127

2. Arencibia-Jorge R, Vega-Almeida RL, Jiménez Andrade JL, Carrillo-Calvet H (2022) Evolution and multidisciplinarity of artificial intelligence research. Scientometrics 127(2):1–20

3. Baruffaldi S, van Beuzekom B, Dernis H, Harhoff D, Rao N, Rosenfeld D, Squicciarini M (2020) Identifying and measuring developments in artificial intelligence: making the impossible possible. (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers)

4. Bianchini S, Müller M, Pelletier P (2022) Artificial intelligence in science: an emerging general method of invention. Res Policy 51(10)

5. Cardon D, Cointet J-P, Mazières A (2018) Neurons spike back. The invention of inductive machines and the artificial intelligence controversy (L. Carey–Libbrecht, Trans.). Réseaux , 211(5), 173–220

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3