Author:
Tisljar Miroslav,Ali Hatem,Gledhill-Flynn Charlie,Garreus Mila,Ponnusamy Arvind,Ahmed Aimun
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the effect of receiving a kidney with PUJ dysfunction on the recipient renal graft function.
Methodology
198 patients, who underwent renal transplantation from 1st January 2004 to 31st December 2014 in a single Center in the North West of England, were retrospectively reviewed using a computerized database. Split kidney function and the PUJ dysfunction for the donors were assessed using Tc-99 m MAG3 renogram. Each recipient with PUJ dysfunction was matched with a control recipient by age, gender, and number of days after transplantation. Both groups were followed up for 3.5 years post-transplantation.
Results
Of the 198 recipients included in the study, 19 recipients received kidneys from donors with PUJ dysfunction. Prevalence of PUJ dysfunction was 9.5% and it was more common in males than females. There was no difference between the case group and the control group in terms of age, gender, and follow-up time post-transplantation. There was also no difference between the case group and the control group in mean creatinine (130 µmol/l and 138 µmol/l respectively, p = 0.305) or the mean eGFR (48.6 ml/min and 47.5 ml/min respectively, p = 0.054) at 3.5 year post-kidney transplantation.
Conclusion
This study showed that PUJ dysfunction of renal allograft has a negligible effect on graft function over 3.5 years period post-transplantation. A prospective randomized trial is needed to test these findings. In the presence of widened gap between demand and supply in renal transplantation, PUJ dysfunction in potential donors should not preclude them from donation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Suthanthiran M, Strom TB (1994) Renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 11 331(6):365–376
2. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL et al (1999) Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J of Med 341(23):1725–1730
3. Xue JL, Mat JZ, Louis TA, Collins AJ (2001) Forecast of the number of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States to the year 2010. J Am Soc Nephrol 12(12):2753
4. Kasiske BL, Cangro CB, Hariharan S et al (2001) The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transplant 1(Suppl 2):3–95
5. Petrini C (2017) Organ transplantation from marginal and non-standard risk donors: ethical requisites for consent from recipients. Ann Ist Super Sanita 53(4):350–353
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献