Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study
Author:
Funder
National Provincial Natural Fund
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Wu Jieping Medical Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Surgery
Link
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13304-021-01143-y.pdf
Reference22 articles.
1. Siegel R, Miller K, Goding-Sauer A et al (2020) Colorectal cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 70:145–164
2. Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S et al (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600
3. DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J et al (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25:1031–1036
4. Winslow E, Fleshman J, Birnbaum E et al (2002) Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1420–1425
5. Xu S, Liu K, Chen X et al (2021) The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic NOSE for sigmoid and rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08260-6
Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Short-term and long-term survival outcomes for transrectal specimen extraction after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a propensity-score matching study;Frontiers in Oncology;2024-01-29
2. Distal sigmoid colon resection with vascular‐oriented D2 lymph node dissection and transrectal specimen extraction (NOSES II);Colorectal Disease;2023-03-29
3. Comparison of natural orifice and conventional transabdominal specimen extraction: literature review;Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery;2023-01
4. Minimally Invasive Concepts in Treating Synchronous Liver Metastases Rectal Cancer Patients: Report of Six Cases;Journal of Investigative Surgery;2022-07-10
5. Comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes in very elderly patients (≥ 80 years old) and elderly (65–79 years old) colorectal cancer patients: a propensity score matching;BMC Gastroenterology;2022-04-25
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3