Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This study assesses the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network, complemented by other Machine Learning techniques (CART, PCA), in predicting the antimicrobial activity of 140 newly designed imidazolium chlorides against Klebsiella pneumoniae before synthesis. Emphasis is on leveraging molecular properties for predictive analysis.
Methods
Classification and regression decision trees (CART) identified the top 200 predictive molecular descriptors. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) reduced these descriptors to 5 components, retaining 99.57% of raw data information. Antimicrobial activity, categorized as high or low, was based on experimentally proven minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), with a cut-point at MIC = 0.856 mol/L. A 12-fold cross-validation trained the MLP (architecture 5-12-2 with 5 Principal Components).
Results
The MLP exhibited commendable performance, achieving almost 90% correct classifications across learning, validation, and test sets, outperforming models without PCA dimension reduction. Key metrics, including accuracy (0.907), sensitivity (0.905), specificity (0.909), and precision (0.891), were notably high. These results highlight the MLP model's efficacy with PCA as a high-quality classifier for determining antimicrobial activity.
Conclusions
The study concludes that the MLP neural network, along with CART and PCA, is a robust tool for predicting the antimicrobial activity class of imidazolium chlorides against Klebsiella pneumoniae. CART and PCA, used in this study, allowed input variable reduction without significant information loss. High classification accuracy and associated metrics affirm the method’s potential utility in pre-synthesis assessments, offering valuable insights for antimicrobial compound design.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. WHO Regional Office for Europe/European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2022–2020 data. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2022.
2. Global antimicrobial resistance and use surveillance system (GLASS) report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
3. TalebiBezminAbadi A, Rizvanov AA, Haertlé T, Blatt NL. World Health Organization Report: Current Crisis of Antibiotic Resistance. Vol. 9, BioNanoScience. Springer New York LLC; 2019. p. 778–88.
4. Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55.
5. Wang G, Zhao G, Chao X, Xie L, Wang H. The characteristic of virulence, biofilm and antibiotic resistance of klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–17.