Leveraging Greenhouse Gas Emissions Traceability in the Groundnut Supply Chain: Blockchain-Enabled Off-Chain Machine Learning as a Driver of Sustainability
-
Published:2024-07-30
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1387-3326
-
Container-title:Information Systems Frontiers
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Inf Syst Front
Author:
El Hathat ZakariaORCID, Venkatesh V. G.ORCID, Sreedharan V. RajaORCID, Zouadi TarikORCID, Manimuthu ArunmozhiORCID, Shi YangyanORCID, Srinivas S. SrivatsaORCID
Abstract
AbstractAs emphasized in multiple United Nations (UN) reports, sustainable agriculture, a key goal in the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), calls for dedicated efforts and innovative solutions. In this study, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the groundnut supply chain from the region of Diourbel & Niakhar, Senegal, to the port of Dakar are investigated. The groundnut supply chain is divided into three steps: cultivation, harvesting, and processing/shipping. This work adheres to UN guidelines, addressing the imperative for sustainable agriculture by applying machine learning-based predictive modeling (MLPMs) utilizing the FAOSTAT and EDGAR databases. Additionally, it provides a novel approach using blockchain-enabled off-chain machine learning through smart contracts built on Hyperledger Fabric to secure GHG emissions storage and machine learning’s predictive analytics from fraud and enhance transparency and data security. This study also develops a decision-making dashboard to provide actionable insights for GHG emissions reduction strategies across the groundnut supply chain.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Aikins, E. F., & Ramanathan, U. (2020). Key factors of carbon footprint in the UK food supply chains: A new perspective of life cycle assessment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(7/8), 945–970. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-06-2019-0478 2. Boehm, R., Wilde, P., Ploeg, M. V., Costello, C., & Cash, S. B. (2018). A comprehensive life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. household food choices. Food Policy, 79, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.05.004 3. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Vecchio, P. D., Oropallo, E., & Secundo, G. (2022). Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. Information & Management, 59(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103508 4. Chanson, M., Bogner, A., Bilgeri, D., Fleisch, E., & Wortmann, F. (2019). Blockchain for the IoT: Privacy-preserving protection of sensor data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(9), 1274–1309. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00567 5. Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Butler, T., Keating, T., Wu, R., Kaminski, J. W., Kuenen, J., Kurokawa, J., Chatani, S., Morikawa, T., Pouliot, G., Racine, J., Moran, M. D., Klimont, Z., Manseau, P. M., Mashayekhi, R., Henderson, B. H., Smith, S., Suchyta, H., & Foley, K. M. (2023). The HTAP_v3 emission mosaic: Merging regional and global monthly emissions (2000–2018) to support air quality modelling and policies. Earth System Science Data, 15(6), 2667–2694. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023
|
|