Abstract
AbstractThis paper enters the ongoing volatility forecasting debate by examining the ability of a wide range of Machine Learning methods (ML), and specifically Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models. The ANN models are compared against traditional econometric models for ten Asian markets using daily data for the time period from 12 September 1994 to 05 March 2018. The empirical results indicate that ML algorithms, across the range of countries, can better approximate dependencies compared to traditional benchmark models. Notably, the predictive performance of such deep learning models is superior perhaps due to its ability in capturing long-range dependencies. For example, the Neuro Fuzzy models of ANFIS and CANFIS, which outperform the EGARCH model, are more flexible in modelling both asymmetry and long memory properties. This offers new insights for Asian markets. In addition to standard statistics forecast metrics, we also consider risk management measures including the value-at-risk (VaR) average failure rate, the Kupiec LR test, the Christoffersen independence test, the expected shortfall (ES) and the dynamic quantile test. The study concludes that ML algorithms provide improving volatility forecasts in the stock markets of Asia and suggest that this may be a fruitful approach for risk management.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference123 articles.
1. Adebiyi AA, Ayo CK, Adebiyi MO, Otokiti SO (2012) Stock price prediction using neural network with hybridized market indicators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences 3(1):1–9
2. Ahamed SA, Ravi C (2021) Study of swarm intelligence algorithms for optimizing deep neural network for bitcoin prediction. International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR) 12(2):22–38
3. Alexander C (2009) Market risk analysis, value at risk models, vol 4. John Wiley & Sons
4. Altay E, Satman MH (2005) Stock market forecasting: artificial neural network and linear regression comparison in an emerging market. Journal of Financial Management & Analysis 18(2):18
5. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T (1998) Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review:885–905
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献