Do artificial neural networks provide improved volatility forecasts: Evidence from Asian markets

Author:

Sahiner Mehmet,McMillan David G.ORCID,Kambouroudis Dimos

Abstract

AbstractThis paper enters the ongoing volatility forecasting debate by examining the ability of a wide range of Machine Learning methods (ML), and specifically Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models. The ANN models are compared against traditional econometric models for ten Asian markets using daily data for the time period from 12 September 1994 to 05 March 2018. The empirical results indicate that ML algorithms, across the range of countries, can better approximate dependencies compared to traditional benchmark models. Notably, the predictive performance of such deep learning models is superior perhaps due to its ability in capturing long-range dependencies. For example, the Neuro Fuzzy models of ANFIS and CANFIS, which outperform the EGARCH model, are more flexible in modelling both asymmetry and long memory properties. This offers new insights for Asian markets. In addition to standard statistics forecast metrics, we also consider risk management measures including the value-at-risk (VaR) average failure rate, the Kupiec LR test, the Christoffersen independence test, the expected shortfall (ES) and the dynamic quantile test. The study concludes that ML algorithms provide improving volatility forecasts in the stock markets of Asia and suggest that this may be a fruitful approach for risk management.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference123 articles.

1. Adebiyi AA, Ayo CK, Adebiyi MO, Otokiti SO (2012) Stock price prediction using neural network with hybridized market indicators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences 3(1):1–9

2. Ahamed SA, Ravi C (2021) Study of swarm intelligence algorithms for optimizing deep neural network for bitcoin prediction. International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR) 12(2):22–38

3. Alexander C (2009) Market risk analysis, value at risk models, vol 4. John Wiley & Sons

4. Altay E, Satman MH (2005) Stock market forecasting: artificial neural network and linear regression comparison in an emerging market. Journal of Financial Management & Analysis 18(2):18

5. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T (1998) Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review:885–905

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3