Author:
Cakmak Mert Can,Agarwal Nitin,Oni Remi
Abstract
AbstractIn today’s digital world, understanding how YouTube’s recommendation systems guide what we watch is crucial. This study dives into these systems, revealing how they influence the content we see over time. We found that YouTube’s algorithms tend to push content in certain directions, affecting the variety and type of videos recommended to viewers. To uncover these patterns, we used a mixed methods approach to analyze videos recommended by YouTube. We looked at the emotions conveyed in videos, the moral messages they might carry, and whether they contained harmful content. Our research also involved statistical analysis to detect biases in how these videos are recommended and network analysis to see how certain videos become more influential than others. Our findings show that YouTube’s algorithms can lead to a narrowing of the content landscape, limiting the diversity of what gets recommended. This has important implications for how information is spread and consumed online, suggesting a need for more transparency and fairness in how these algorithms work. In summary, this paper highlights the need for a more inclusive approach to how digital platforms recommend content. By better understanding the impact of YouTube’s algorithms, we can work towards creating a digital space that offers a wider range of perspectives and voices, affording fairness, and enriching everyone’s online experience.
Funder
U.S. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
U.S. National Science Foundation
U.S. Army Research Office
U.S. Office of Naval Research
U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Arkansas Research Alliance, the Jerry L. Maulden/Entergy Endowment at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, and the Australian Department of Defense Strategic Policy Grants Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. Adeliyi O, Solaiman I, Shajari S, et al (2024) Detecting and characterizing inorganic user engagement on Youtube. In: Workshop Proceedings of the 18th international AAAI conference on web and social media: CySoc 2024: 5th international workshop on cyber social threats. AAAI, Palo Alto, California, https://doi.org/10.36190/2024.01
2. Aïmeur E, Amri S, Brassard G (2023) Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review. Soc Netw Anal Min 13(1):30
3. Al-Asad H, Zarkachi I (2023) The role of international amnesty in China’s discrimination conflict against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang 2018–2022. Mediasi: J Int Relat 6(2):23–31
4. Alp E, Gergin B, Eraslan YA et al (2022) Covid-19 and vaccine tweet analysis. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08242-9_9
5. Atkinson AB et al (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2(3):244–263