Critical review on in silico methods for structural annotation of chemicals detected with LC/HRMS non-targeted screening
-
Published:2024-08-14
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1618-2642
-
Container-title:Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Anal Bioanal Chem
Author:
Hupatz Henrik, Rahu IdaORCID, Wang Wei-Chieh, Peets Pilleriin, Palm Emma H., Kruve Anneli
Abstract
AbstractNon-targeted screening with liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/HRMS) is increasingly leveraging in silico methods, including machine learning, to obtain candidate structures for structural annotation of LC/HRMS features and their further prioritization. Candidate structures are commonly retrieved based on the tandem mass spectral information either from spectral or structural databases; however, the vast majority of the detected LC/HRMS features remain unannotated, constituting what we refer to as a part of the unknown chemical space. Recently, the exploration of this chemical space has become accessible through generative models. Furthermore, the evaluation of the candidate structures benefits from the complementary empirical analytical information such as retention time, collision cross section values, and ionization type. In this critical review, we provide an overview of the current approaches for retrieving and prioritizing candidate structures. These approaches come with their own set of advantages and limitations, as we showcase in the example of structural annotation of ten known and ten unknown LC/HRMS features. We emphasize that these limitations stem from both experimental and computational considerations. Finally, we highlight three key considerations for the future development of in silico methods.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
H2020 European Research Council Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning Vetenskapsrådet Stockholm University Center for Circular and Sustainable Systems Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Stockholm University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference116 articles.
1. Black G, Lowe C, Anumol T, Bade J, Favela K, Feng Y-L, Knolhoff A, Mceachran A, Nuñez J, Fisher C, Peter K, Quinete NS, Sobus J, Sussman E, Watson W, Wickramasekara S, Williams A, Young T. Exploring chemical space in non-targeted analysis: a proposed ChemSpace tool. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2023;415:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04434-4. 2. Renner G, Reuschenbach M. Critical review on data processing algorithms in non-target screening: challenges and opportunities to improve result comparability. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2023;415:4111–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04776-7. 3. Hollender J, Schymanski EL, Ahrens L, Alygizakis N, Béen F, Bijlsma L, Brunner AM, Celma A, Fildier A, Fu Q, Gago-Ferrero P, Gil-Solsona R, Haglund P, Hansen M, Kaserzon S, Kruve A, Lamoree M, Margoum C, Meijer J, Merel S, Rauert C, Rostkowski P, Samanipour S, Schulze B, Schulze T, Singh RR, Slobodnik J, Steininger-Mairinger T, Thomaidis NS, Togola A, Vorkamp K, Vulliet E, Zhu L, Krauss M. NORMAN guidance on suspect and non-target screening in environmental monitoring. Environ Sci Eur. 2023;35:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00779-4. 4. Hulleman T, Turkina V, O’Brien JW, Chojnacka A, Thomas KV, Samanipour S. Critical Assessment of the Chemical Space Covered by LC–HRMS Non-Targeted Analysis. Environ Sci Technol. 2023;57:14101–12. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03606. 5. Manz KE, Feerick A, Braun JM, Feng Y-L, Hall A, Koelmel J, Manzano C, Newton SR, Pennell KD, Place BJ, Godri Pollitt KJ, Prasse C, Young JA. Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2023;33:524–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00574-6.
|
|