Higher success rate observed in reconstruction techniques of acute posterolateral corner knee injuries as compared to repair: an updated systematic review

Author:

Fortier Luc M.1,Knapik Derrick M.2,Condon Josh J.3,DeWald Daniel4,Khan Zeeshan4,Kerzner Benjamin3,Matava Matthew J.2,LaPrade Robert5,Chahla Jorge34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center 11100 Euclid Ave 44106 Cleveland OH USA

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Washington University and Barnes‐Jewish Orthopedic Center 14532 South Outer Forty Drive 63017 Chesterfield MO USA

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Rush University Medical Center 1611 W Harrison St. Suite 300 60612 Chicago IL USA

4. Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush 1611 W Harrison St. 60612 Chicago IL USA

5. Twin Cities Orthopaedics 4010 W 65th St. 55435 Edina MN USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThere remains controversy regarding the optimal surgical treatment for acute complete (grade III) posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the contemporary literature regarding surgical options and subsequent outcomes of acute grade III PLC injuries.MethodsA systematic review was performed using the following search terms: posterolateral corner knee, posterolateral knee, posterolateral instability, multi‐ligament knee, and knee dislocation. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies with level I–IV evidence, reporting on human patients with acute grade III PLC injuries undergoing operative management within 4 weeks from injury, with subjective and/or objective outcomes (including varus stress examinations or varus stress radiographs) reported at a minimum 2‐year follow‐up. Two investigators independently performed the search by sequentially screening articles. Accepted definitions of varus stability on examination or stress radiographs and revision surgery were used to determine success and failure of treatment.ResultsA total of 12 studies, consisting of 288 patients were included. Ten studies reported primary repair, while reconstruction techniques were reported in seven studies. Overall, 43% (n = 125/288) of injuries involved the PLC, ACL and PCL. Staged reconstruction was reported in 25% (n = 3/12) of studies. The Lysholm score was the most commonly reported outcome measure. An overall failure rate of 12.4% (n = 35/282) was observed. Surgical failure was significantly higher in patients undergoing repair (21.9%; n = 21/96) compared to reconstruction (7.1%; n = 6/84) (p = 0.0058). Return to sport was greater in patients undergoing reconstruction (100%; n = 22/22) compared to repair (94%; n = 48/51) (n.s). The most common post‐operative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia (8.7%; n = 25/288). A total of 3.8% (n = 11/288) of patients underwent revision PLC reconstruction.ConclusionThere remains substantial heterogeneity in the surgical techniques of acute, grade III PLC injuries with an overall failure rate of 12.4%. Failure rates were significantly lower, and return to sport rates higher in patients undergoing PLC reconstruction compared to repair. The most common postoperative complication was arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference58 articles.

1. All-Arthroscopic Treatment of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Corner Instability

2. Surgical Outcome of 2-Stage Management of Multiple Knee Ligament Injuries After Knee Dislocation

3. BokshK GhoshA NarayanP DivallP AujlaRFibular‐ versus tibiofibular‐based reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee: a systematic review and meta‐analysis.Am J Sports Med202310.1177/03635465221138548363546522113854836960926

4. Medium-Term (5-Year) Comparison of the Functional Outcomes of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Compared With Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

5. Posterolateral corner of the knee: current concepts;Chahla J;Arch Bone Jt Surg,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3