Improving the reliability of measurements in orthopaedics and sports medicine

Author:

Królikowska Aleksandra1ORCID,Reichert Paweł2,Karlsson Jon3,Mouton Caroline45,Becker Roland67,Prill Robert67

Affiliation:

1. Ergonomics and Biomedical Monitoring Laboratory Department of Physiotherapy Faculty of Health Sciences Wroclaw Medical University Tytusa Chalubinskiego 3 50‐368 Wroclaw Poland

2. Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery Faculty of Medicine Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland

3. Department of Orthopaedics Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Clinique d’Eich–Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg Luxembourg City Luxembourg

5. Luxembourg Institute of Research in Orthopaedics Sports Medicine and Science Luxembourg City Luxembourg

6. Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane Brandenburg a.d.H. Germany

7. Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane Brandenburg a.d.H. Germany

Abstract

AbstractA large space still exists for improving the measurements used in orthopaedics and sports medicine, especially as we face rapid technological progress in devices used for diagnostic or patient monitoring purposes. For a specific measure to be valuable and applicable in clinical practice, its reliability must be established. Reliability refers to the extent to which measurements can be replicated, and three types of reliability can be distinguished: inter‐rater, intra‐rater, and test–retest. The present article aims to provide insights into reliability as one of the most important and relevant properties of measurement tools. It covers essential knowledge about the methods used in orthopaedics and sports medicine for reliability studies. From design to interpretation, this article guides readers through the reliability study process. It addresses crucial issues such as the number of raters needed, sample size calculation, and breaks between particular trials. Different statistical methods and tests are presented for determining reliability depending on the type of gathered data, with particular attention to the commonly used intraclass correlation coefficient.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3