Predicting the O’Kelly-Marotta scale score after flow-diverter stent placement using silent MRA

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Flow-diverter (FD) stents were developed to treat aneurysms that are difficult to treat with conventional coiling or surgery. This study aimed to compare usefulness of Silent MRA and TOF (time of flight) -MRA in patients with aneurysms after FD placement. Materials and methods We retrospectively collected images from 22 patients with 23 internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with FD. Two radiologists conducted MRA and DSA experiments. In the first reading experiment, the radiologists evaluated the aneurysm filling by employing Silent MRA and TOF-MRA and utilizing the modified O’Kelly-Marotta (OKM) scale, a four-class classification system for aneurysms after FD placement. We then calculated the agreement between the modified OKM scale on MRA and the original OKM scale on DSA. In the second reading experiment, the radiologists rated blood flow within the FD using a five-point scale. Results The weighted kappa value of the OKM scale between DSA and TOF-MRA was 0.436 (moderate agreement), and that between DSA and Silent MRA was 0.943 (almost perfect agreement). The accuracies for the four-class classification were 0.435 and 0.870 for TOF-MRA and Silent MRA, respectively. The mean score of blood flow within FD for TOF-MRA was 2.43 ± 0.90 and that for Silent MRA was 3.04 ± 1.02 (P < 0.001). Conclusion Silent MRA showed a higher degree of agreement than TOF-MRA in aneurysm filling with DSA. In addition, Silent MRA was significantly superior to TOF-MRA in depicting blood flow within the FD. Therefore, Silent MRA is clinically useful for the follow-up of patients after FD placement.