Comparative metabolomic analysis of the phloem sap of nine citrus relatives with different degrees of susceptibility to Huanglongbing disease
-
Published:2024-06-28
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0929-1873
-
Container-title:European Journal of Plant Pathology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Plant Pathol
Author:
Herranz María C.ORCID, Navarro Jose AntonioORCID, Locascio Antonella, Peña LeandroORCID, Manzanares PalomaORCID, Marcos Jose F.ORCID, Pallás VicenteORCID
Abstract
AbstractCitrus Huanglongbing (HLB) disease, also known as “citrus greening”, is currently considered the most devastating citrus disease due to its rapid spread, and high severity. Presently, research efforts are focused on searching for either curative treatments or resistant cultivars to combat the HLB-associated bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas).Metabolomics can help to unravel the mechanisms supporting the potential tolerance/resistance of citrus relatives. Herein, we carried out a metabolomic analysis to determine whether the level of resistance of nine citrus-related genotypes is influenced by their pre-existing metabolic background before infection. For this purpose, the healthy phloem of nine Citrinae genotypes previously categorized according to their different responses to HLB was analyzed. A total of 53 different metabolites were targeted, including amino acids, organic and inorganic acids, and sugars. Interestingly, we observed that resistant and partially resistant genotypes exhibited higher accumulations of organic acids such as quinic acid and citric acid. In contrast, the amount of total sugars showed a clear upward trend in the susceptible genotypes. Notably, within this last group of metabolites, sugar acids increase in both partially resistant and resistant accessions, being more evident in the resistant group.Alterations potentially linked to resistance levels were detected in specific amino acids belonging to the aspartate and glutamate families. Notably, only lysine levels exhibited a significant increase in the susceptible cultivars. The evaluation of five genes associated with lysine catabolism by RT-qPCR revealed differences in transcript abundance between resistant and susceptible samples suggesting a potential key role in plant defence. These findings open a new avenue to identify metabolites and/or substances that could aid in developing resistance strategies to this devastating disease.
Funder
H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology Conselleria de Cultura, Educación y Ciencia, Generalitat Valenciana Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Albrecht, U., Fiehn, O., & Bowman, K. D. (2016). Metabolic variations in different citrus rootstock cultivars associated with different responses to Huanglongbing. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 107, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.030 2. Albrecht, U., Tripathi, I., & Bowman, K. D. (2020). Rootstock influences the metabolic response to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in grafted sweet orange trees. Trees - Structure and Function, 34, 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01925-3 3. Alves, M. N., Lopes, S. A., Raiol-Junior, L. L., Wulff, N. A., Girardi, E. A., Ollitrault, P., & Peña, L. (2021). Resistance to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, the Huanglongbing Associated Bacterium, in Sexually and/or Graft-Compatible Citrus Relatives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.617664 4. Alves, M. N., Raiol-Junior, L. L., Girardi, E. A., Miranda, M., Carvalho, E. V., Lopes, S. A., Ferro, J. A., Ollitrault, P., & Peña, L. (2022). Insight into resistance to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, associated with Huanglongbing, in Oceanian citrus genotypes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1009350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1009350 5. Arruda, P., & Barreto, P. (2020). Lysine Catabolism Through the Saccharopine Pathway: Enzymes and Intermediates Involved in Plant Responses to Abiotic and Biotic Stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00587
|
|