The GDL Vulnerability Index (GVI)
-
Published:2024-08-17
Issue:2
Volume:174
Page:721-741
-
ISSN:0303-8300
-
Container-title:Social Indicators Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Soc Indic Res
Author:
Smits JeroenORCID, Huisman Janine
Abstract
AbstractIn this paper we present the GDL Vulnerability Index (GVI), a new composite index to monitor and analyse the human components of vulnerability to climate change, natural disasters, and other kinds of shocks, for societies and geographic areas across the globe. The GVI is a simple and flexible index designed for use by experts as well as non-experts in the climate field, including researchers, (local) politicians, NGO’s, journalists, advocacy groups and grassroot movements. The GVI is based on an additive formula that summarizes the essence of seven socioeconomic dimensions of vulnerability into a single number. This formula approach sets this index apart from other existing indices. Any person who knows the values of the underlying indicators can compute the vulnerability score of an area by filling in these values in the GVI formula. Validity tests show that the data-driven GVI measures the vulnerability dimensions coping capacity, adaptive capacity and susceptibility as well as major expert-based indices. This offers great prospects for use in situations where no other vulnerability information is available. Here we explain the construction of the GVI, test its validity and present GVI values for (almost) all countries of the world and for major global regions.
Funder
Climate Vulnerability Forum, UNOPS
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Andrijevic, M., Crespo Cuaresma, J., Lissner, T., Adelle, T., & Schleussner, C. F. (2020). Overcoming gender inequality for climate resilient development. Nature Communications, 11, 6261. 2. Andrijevic, M., Byers, E., Mastrucci, A., Smits, J., & Fuss, S. (2021). Future cooling gap in Shared Socioeconomic pathways. Environmental Research Letters, 16, 094053. 3. Atwii, F., Bergtora Sandvik, K., Kirch, L., Paragi, B., Radtke, K., Schneider, S., & Weller, D. (2022). World Risk Report 2022. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft. https://reliefweb.int/attachments/6c1c1c6f-91d8-48ed-b8b5-b5918cc426a5/WorldRiskReport-2022_Online.pdf. 4. Bartholomew, D. J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., & Galbraith, J. I. (2002). Principal components analysis. The analysis and interpretation of Multivariate Data for Social scientists (pp. 115–142). Boa Raton. 5. Becker, W., Saisana, M., Paruolo, P., & Vandecasteele, I. (2017). Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap. Ecological Indicators, 80, 12–22.
|
|