Patterns of Sexual Practices, Sexually Transmitted Infections and Other Genital Infections in Women Who Have Sex with Women Only (WSWO), Women Who Have Sex with Men Only (WSMO) and Women Who Have Sex with Men and Women (WSMW): Findings from a Sexual Health Clinic in Melbourne, Australia, 2011–2019

Author:

Engel Jaimie L.,Fairley Christopher K.ORCID,Greaves Kate E.,Vodstrcil Lenka A.ORCID,Ong Jason J.ORCID,Bradshaw Catriona S.ORCID,Chen Marcus Y.ORCID,Phillips Tiffany R.ORCID,Chow Eric P. F.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractDespite rises in sexually transmitted infection (STI) notifications among Australian women in the last decade, limited STI surveillance data exist specifically for women who have sex with women. This study aimed to compare differences in sexual practices and positivity for STIs and other genital infections among women who have sex with men only (WSMO), women who have sex with women only (WSWO), and women who have sex with men and women (WSMW), and whether these changed over time. In this retrospective repeated cross-sectional study, women attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre for the first time between 2011 and 2019 were categorized as “WSMW,” “WSWO,” or “WSMO” according to self-reported sexual practices in the previous 12 months. Demographic information, sexual practices, and positivity for STIs and other genital infections were compared between the three groups and over time. A total of 36,147 women (2618 WSMW, 534 WSWO, and 32,995 WSMO) were included. WSMW reported more sexual partners (median = 6; IQR = 4–10) than WSMO (median = 3; IQR = 2–5) and WSWO (median = 2; IQR = 1–4) (p < .001). A higher proportion of WSMW always used condoms with casual male partners compared to WSMO (20.4% vs 15.9%; p < .001). The proportion of women who always used condoms with casual male partners decreased over time in WSMO, (19.9% in 2011 to 15.2% in 2019, ptrend < .001) but not in WSMW. Bacterial vaginosis was more common in WSWO (14.8%) than in WSMW (11.8%) and WSMO (7.7%) (p < .001). Chlamydia was more common in WSMO (9.3%) than in WSMW (6.6%) and WSWO (1.2%) (p < .001). Syphilis was more common in WSMO (1.0%) than in WSMW (0.3%) and WSWO (0.0%) (p = .004). Over time, chlamydia positivity in WSWO increased (from 0.0% to 2.7%, ptrend = .014), and syphilis positivity in WSMW increased (from 0.0% to 0.7%, ptrend = .028); however, positivity of these STIs did not change in other groups. Sexual practices and positivity for STIs and other genital infections differed according to the sex of women’s partners in the previous 12 months. Knowledge of these differences is important to account for future changes in STI trends that may occur in these subpopulations.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Monash University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference63 articles.

1. Adam, P. C. G., de Wit, J. B. F., Ketsuwan, I., & Treloar, C. (2019). Sexual health-related knowledge, attitudes and practices of young people in Australia. Results from the 2018 Debrief Survey among heterosexual and non-heterosexual respondents. Sydney: Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney. https://doi.org/10.26190/5c5128aac57e5

2. Australasian Sexual Health Alliance. (2019, updated 22 June 2019). Australian STI management guidelines for use in primary care: Gonorrhoea. Retrieved from http://www.sti.guidelines.org.au/sexually-transmissible-infections/gonorrhoea#diagnosis.

3. Australian Government Department of Health. (2012). Surveillance of notifiable infectious diseases in Victoria, 2010. Melbourne, Australia. https://vgls.sdp.sirsidynix.net.au/client/search/asset/1280375

4. Australian Government Department of Health. (2018). Fourth national sexually transmissible infections strategy. Canberra, Australia.

5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019). The health of Australia’s females. Canberra, ACT. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/men-women/female-health/contents/how-healthy/sexual-health.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3