Accurate height and length estimation in hospitalized children not fulfilling WHO criteria for standard measurement: a multicenter prospective study

Author:

Ford Chessel Carole,Berthiller Julien,Haran Isabelle,Tume Lyvonne N.ORCID,Bourgeaud Christelle,Tsapis Michael,Gaillard-Le Roux Benedicte,Gauvard Evelyne,Loire Claire,Guillot Camille,Mouneydier Karine,Nolent Paul,Blache Thibault,Cour Andlauer FleurORCID,Rooze Shancy,Jotterand Chaparro CorinneORCID,Morice ClaireORCID,Subtil Fabien,Huot Margaux,Valla Frédéric VORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn hospitalized children, height should be measured. When world health organization (WHO) height measurement gold standards is impossible, the ideal height estimation technique is still unclear. We conducted an international prospective study in eight different pediatric intensive care units to assess the accuracy, precision, practicability, safety, and inter-rater reliability of 12 different height estimation techniques, based on body segment measurement extrapolation, or other calculations using previous or projected heights. All extrapolation techniques were performed on each child, and later compared to their WHO gold standard heights. A total of 476 patients were enrolled. In the < 2-year subgroup, board length use and growth chart extrapolation performed best. In the ≥ 2-year subgroup, growth chart extrapolation and parents’ report were the most accurate, followed by height measurement alongside the body with a tape measure. In both groups, body segment extrapolations were poorly predictive and showed mean bias and limits of agreement that varied a lot with age. Most body segment-based techniques presented with frequent measurement difficulties, but children’s safety was rarely compromised. The inter-rater reliability of body segment measurement was low in the < 2-year subgroup.Conclusions: To accurately estimate height in hospitalized children, health care professionals should integrate the accuracy, precision, practicability, and reliability of each measurement technique to select the most appropriate one. Body segment-based techniques were the least accurate and should probably not be used. Simple techniques like growth chart extrapolation, or measurement alongside the body (and length board measurement in the youngest) should be implemented in daily practice.Trial Registration: The study protocol was registered (12th April 2019) on the clinical-trial.gov website (NCT03913247). What is Known:Height should be measured in hospitalized children to assess nutritional status and calculate various clinical parameters. • Many hospitalized children cannot be measured using WHO conventional height measurement methods. The ideal height estimation method has not been identified yet What is New:Most estimation methods based on body segment measurement extrapolation fail to accurately predict height.• Board length use and growth chart extrapolation performed best in young children (≥2 years). Growth chart extrapolation and parents’ report were the most accurate, followed by height measurement alongside the body with a tape measure in older children.

Funder

French ministry of health

Reseau Mère Enfant de la francophonie

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference21 articles.

1. Tume LN, Valla FV, Joosten K, Chaparro CJ, Latten L, Marino LV et al (2020) Nutritional support for children during critical illness: European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) metabolism, endocrine and nutrition section position statement and clinical recommendations. Intensive Care Med 46:411–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05922-5

2. Mehta NM, Skillman HE, Irving SY, Coss-Bu JA, Vermilyea S, Farrington EA et al (2017) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the pediatric critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 41:706–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607117711387

3. Jotterand Chaparro C, Taffé P, Moullet C, Laure Depeyre J, Longchamp D, Perez MH et al (2017) Performance of predictive equations specifically developed to estimate resting energy expenditure in ventilated critically ill children. J Pediatr 184:220-226.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.12.063

4. Onyango AW, De Onis M, Organization WH (2008) WHO child growth standards: training course on child growth assessment. [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241595070. Accessed 21 Jul 2024

5. Chumlea WC, Guo SS, Steinbaugh ML (1994) Prediction of stature from knee height for black and white adults and children with application to mobility-impaired or handicapped persons. J Am Diet Assoc 94:1385–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8223(94)92540-2

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3