Abstract
AbstractWhen the sociobiology debate erupted in 1975, there were almost too many contributions to the heated exchanges between sociobiologists and their critics to count. In the fall of 1976, a Canadian educational film entitled Sociobiology: Doing What Comes Naturally sparked further controversy due to its graphic visuals and outrageous narration. While critics claimed the film was a promotional tool to further the sociobiological agenda in educational settings, sociobiologists quickly distanced themselves from the film and, in turn, accused the critics of consciously misrepresenting sociobiology by organizing showings of the film. Using audio, video, archival, and published sources, this paper explores the complicated history of Sociobiology: Doing What Comes Naturally and demonstrates how the public debate about the film reflects the positions, polemics, and polarization of the sociobiology debate as a whole.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference85 articles.
1. Agar, Jon. 2008. What happened in the sixties? The British Journal for the History of Science 41: 567–600.
2. Allen, Elizabeth et al. 1975. Against sociobiology. New York Review of Books, 13 (November): 43–44.
3. Atkins, Dan, Jack Dougherty, Walda Katz Fishman, and Frank Rosenthal. 1978. Towards a renewed and expanded SftP role among science teachers. Science for the People Magazine 10(4): 34–35.
4. Beckwith, Jon. 2002. Making genes, making waves: A social activist in science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Beckwith, Jon, and Bob Lange. 1978. AAAS: Sociobiology on the run. Science for the People Magazine 10 (2): 38–39.