Perioperative Opioid Stewardship Program: Barriers and Promotors of Implementation and Sustainability
-
Published:2024-05-20
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2662-9275
-
Container-title:Global Implementation Research and Applications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Glob Implement Res Appl
Author:
Allen Megan L.ORCID, Somasundaram Kaleswari, Leslie Kate, Manski-Nankervis Jo-Anne
Abstract
AbstractPerioperative opioid stewardship programs aim to harness the benefits of opioid analgesia for managing acute post-surgical pain whilst mitigating potential harm. Healthcare worker stakeholders are vital for the effective program introduction and continuation. However, their perceptions of program barriers and promotors are underexplored. We conducted twenty semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers across three health services that introduced a perioperative opioid stewardship program. The participants included specialist pain medicine physicians, anaesthetist managers, pain nurses, pharmacists and Junior Medical Officers. Interviews were transcribed and coded both inductively and deductively against the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Key themes from the data were reviewed, refined and reported. Participants were generally aware of perioperative opioid stewardship principles but senior clinicians reported greater specific program knowledge. Adherence to the discharge opioid prescription guideline was promoted by hospital leadership endorsement and workflow integration. A universal barrier to program adherence was inadequate resourcing. Lack of role clarity was a barrier to patient discharge opioid education. Hospital-community prescriber communication was variable but generally limited to written discharge summaries rather than a comprehensive, personalised approach. Introducing an Electronic Medical Record was universally seen as an opportunity to promote better program integration and sustainment. This study deepens our current understanding of the drivers of observed perioperative opioid stewardship program outcomes from the perspective of healthcare worker stakeholders. The findings could be used to optimise existing programs or to guide the implementation of new programs to achieve effective clinical change.
Funder
University of Melbourne
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Alexander, J. A., & Hearld, L. R. (2012). Methods and metrics challenges of delivery-system research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-15. 2. Allen, M. L., Kim, C. C., Braat, S., Jones, K., Winter, N., Hucker, T. R., Chia, A., Lang, C., Brooks, S. L., & Williams, D. L. (2020). Post-discharge opioid use and handling in surgical patients: A multicentre prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 48(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X19895019. 3. Allen, M. L., De Silva, A. P., Braat, S., Jones, K., Chia, A., Hucker, T. R., Brooks, S. L., Hogg, M., Lee, C. W., Williams, D. L., & Kim, C. C. (2023). Post-surgical discharge opioid prescribing, use and handling after introduction of a stewardship program. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 51(4), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X231160800. 4. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2022). Opioid analgesic stewardship in acute pain clinical care standard - acute care edition. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/clinical-care-standards/opioid-analgesic-stewardship-acute-pain-clinical-care-standard. 5. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (2022). PS41
|
|