Abstract
AbstractWe analyze the infinite repetition with imperfect feedback of a simultaneous or sequential game, assuming that players are strategically sophisticated—but impatient—expected-utility maximizers. Sophisticated strategic reasoning in the repeated game is combined with belief updating to provide a foundation for a refinement of self-confirming equilibrium. In particular, we model strategic sophistication as rationality and common strong belief in rationality. Then, we combine belief updating and sophisticated reasoning to provide sufficient conditions for a kind of learning—that is, the ability, in the limit, to exactly forecast the sequence of future observations—thus showing that impatient agents end up playing a sequence of self-confirming equilibria in strongly rationalizable conjectures of the one-period game.
Funder
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Battigalli, P.: Comportamento Razionale ed Equilibrio nei Giochi e nelle Situazioni Sociali. Unpublished thesis, Università Bocconi (1987)
2. Battigalli, P., Catonini, E., De Vito, N.: Game Theory: Analysis of Strategic Thinking. Bocconi University, Bocconi (2023)
3. Battigalli, P., Catonini, E., Lanzani, G., Marinacci, M.: Ambiguity attitudes and self-confirming equilibrium in sequential games. Games Econom. Behav. 115, 1–29 (2019)
4. Battigalli, P., Cerreia-Vioglio, S.C., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M.: Self-confirming equilibrium and model uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 646–677 (2015)
5. Battigalli, P., De Vito, N.: Beliefs, plans, and perceived intentions in dynamic games. J. Econ. Theory 195, 1052–83 (2021)