1. •• Hoffmann DE, Rothenberg KH. Judging genes: implications of the second generation of genetic tests in the courtroom. MD Law Rev. 2007;66:858-922. This study is the first to empirically explore how judges consider requests to admit or compel genetic tests to confirm or predict genetic diseases and conditions and to consider the broader implications of the use of such tests in court proceedings.
2. John P. When neurogenetics hurts: examining the use of neuroscience and genetic evidence in sentencing decisions through implicit bias. Calif Law Rev. 2015;103(4):1019–45.
3. Mental Health America. Parents with mental illness and child custody issues. In: Parenting Community. 2011.
http://www.healthyplace.com/parenting/parents-with-mental-illness/parents-with-mental-illness-and-child-custody-issues/
.
4. Lightfoot E, Hill K, LaLiberte T. The inclusion of disability as a condition for termination of parental rights. Child Abuse Negl. 2010;34(12):927–34. doi:
10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.07.001
.
5. Marsh DT. Parental mental illness: issues in custody determinations. Am J Fam Law. 2009;23(1):28–36.