Abstract
AbstractIn recent decades, research has stressed the prominence of mathematics classroom discussions in productive instructional practices in mathematics instruction. In this context, problem-solving activities have been a common focus of research. Research shows that teachers need to deal with prerequisites and challenges such as norms, design of tasks, activating students, and leading students’ discussion to achieve a productive whole-class discussion. However, another promising activity for achieving productive discussions involves using a classroom response system and implementing different task types in a multiple-choice format. There is little knowledge about whole-class discussions using this approach. To meet this need, this paper presents results from a mixed-method approach that characterizes whole-class discussions to explore the potential of multiple-choice tasks supported by a classroom response system to achieve productive whole-class discussions. Three types of multiple-choice tasks were implemented in the classrooms of twelve mathematics teachers at secondary schools. The lessons, including 35 whole-class discussions, were video-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. The results summarize the characteristics of these whole-class discussions, including measures of students’ opportunities to talk and teacher and student actions. These results can help us develop a more profound understanding of whether and how multiple-choice tasks supported by a classroom response system can support teachers in achieving productive whole-class discussions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference63 articles.
1. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Characteristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the West. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 147–164. https://educationforatoz.com/images/_9734_12_Glenda_Anthony.pdf
2. Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A Research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9140-4
3. Boscardin, C., & Penuel, W. (2012). Exploring benefits of audience-response systems on learning: A review of the literature. Academic Psychiatry, 36(5), 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.10080110
4. Brodie, K. (2010). Pressing dilemmas: Meaning-making and justification in mathematics teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903149873
5. Cengiz, N., Kline, K., & Grant, T. J. (2011). Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9179-7
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献