Microplastic Contamination of Composts and Liquid Fertilizers from Municipal Biowaste Treatment Plants: Effects of the Operating Conditions
-
Published:2022-08-17
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1877-2641
-
Container-title:Waste and Biomass Valorization
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Waste Biomass Valor
Author:
Steiner Thomas, Möller Julia N., Löder Martin G. J., Hilbrig Frank, Laforsch Christian, Freitag RuthORCID
Abstract
Abstract
High-caloric-value household biowaste is an attractive substrate for the production of biogas and fertilizer. Most household biowaste is contaminated by plastics, typically in the form of bags and foils from packaging. Operators of municipal biowaste treatment plans take great care to remove these contaminants, often at the cost of reducing the organic material entering the process. This study compares the residual plastic contamination of fertilizer (composts, digestates) from biowaste treatment plants with compost produced from greenery and digestates produced by agricultural biogas plants processing manure and energy crops. While the fertilizers from the agricultural biogas plants and greenery composts were minimally contaminated by plastic, we found considerable numbers of plastic fragments in the composts/fertilizers from the biowaste treatment plants. Moreover, while certainly being influenced by the quality of the incoming biowaste, this residual contamination appeared to depend largely on the operating conditions. In particular, shredding of the incoming material increased the degree of contamination. Sieving was an efficient method for the removal of fragments > 5 mm but was less efficient for the removal of smaller fragments. In view of the number of the recovered fragments in that size range, it is likely that still none of the finished composts surpassed the current dry weight limits imposed for the plastic contamination of high-quality composts with fragments > 1 mm in Europe (0.3% of dry weight) nor even in Germany (0.1% of dry weight). The contamination of the liquid fertilizer produced via anaerobic digestion by three of the investigated biowaste treatment plants (up to 10,000 particles with a size between 10 and 1000 μm−1) may pose a more serious concern.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
German Research Foundation, CRC 1357 – “Mikroplastik” Ministry of the Environment, Climate Protection and Energy, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany Universität Bayreuth
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Waste Management and Disposal,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Environmental Engineering
Reference26 articles.
1. Lassen, C., Hansen, S.F., Magnusson, K., Norén, F., Hartmann, N.I., Jensen, P.R., Nielsen, T.G., Brinch, A.: Microplastics—occurrence, effects and sources of releases to the environment in Denmark. (2012). https://mst.dk/service/publikationer/publikationsarkiv/2015/nov/rapport-om-mikroplast/ 2. Lehmphul, K.: Sources of Microplastics Relevant to Marine Protection in Germany. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau (2015) 3. Stolte, A., Forster, S., Gerdts, G., Schubert, H.: Microplastic concentrations in beach sediments along the German Baltic coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 99, 216–229 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.07.022 4. Kawecki, D., Nowack, B.: Polymer-specific modeling of the environmental emissions of seven commodity plastics as macro- and microplastics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 9664–9676 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02900 5. Allen, S., Allen, D., Phoenix, V.R., Le Roux, G., Durántez Jiménez, P., Simonneau, A., Binet, S., Galop, D.: Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment. Nat. Geosci. 12, 339–344 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0335-5
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|