Author:
Liu Jiaying,Bai Xiaomei,Wang Mengying,Tuarob Suppawong,Xia Feng
Abstract
AbstractCitation network analysis attracts increasing attention from disciplines of complex network analysis and science of science. One big challenge in this regard is that there are unreasonable citations in citation networks, i.e., cited papers are not relevant to the citing paper. Existing research on citation analysis has primarily concentrated on the contents and ignored the complex relations between academic entities. In this paper, we propose a novel research topic, that is, how to detect anomalous citations. To be specific, we first define anomalous citations and propose a unified framework, named ACTION, to detect anomalous citations in a heterogeneous academic network. ACTION is established based on non-negative matrix factorization and network representation learning, which considers not only the relevance of citation contents but also the relationships among academic entities including journals, papers, and authors. To evaluate the performance of ACTION, we construct three anomalous citation datasets. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Detecting anomalous citations carry profound significance for academic fairness.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Liberal arts and Social Sciences Foundation
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Dalian Science and Technology Talent Innovation Support Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference76 articles.
1. Abu-Jbara A, Ezra J, Radev D (2013) Purpose and polarity of citation: towards NLP-based bibliometrics. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp 596–606
2. Bai X, Xia F, Lee I et al (2016) Identifying anomalous citations for objective evaluation of scholarly article impact. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0162,364
3. Bai X, Lee I, Ning Z et al (2017) The role of positive and negative citations in scientific evaluation. IEEE Access 5:17,607-17,617
4. Bai X, Pan H, Hou J et al (2020) Quantifying success in science: an overview. IEEE Access 8:123,200-123,214
5. Bernburg JG (2019) Labeling theory. Handbook on crime and deviance pp 179–196