Abstract
Abstract
Background
Snacking is a common diet behaviour which accounts for a large proportion of daily energy intake, making it a key determinant of diet quality. However, the relationship between snacking frequency, quality and timing with cardiometabolic health remains unclear.
Design
Demography, diet, health (fasting and postprandial cardiometabolic blood and anthropometrics markers) and stool metagenomics data were assessed in the UK PREDICT 1 cohort (N = 1002) (NCT03479866). Snacks (foods or drinks consumed between main meals) were self-reported (weighed records) across 2–4 days. Average snacking frequency and quality [snack diet index (SDI)] were determined (N = 854 after exclusions). Associations between snacking frequency, quality and timing with cardiometabolic blood and anthropometric markers were assessed using regression models (adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education, physical activity level and main meal quality).
Results
Participants were aged (mean, SD) 46.1 ± 11.9 years, had a mean BMI of 25.6 ± 4.88 kg/m2 and were predominantly female (73%). 95% of participants were snackers (≥ 1 snack/day; n = 813); mean daily snack intake was 2.28 snacks/day (24 ± 16% of daily calories; 203 ± 170 kcal); and 44% of participants were discordant for meal and snack quality. In snackers, overall snacking frequency and quantity of snack energy were not associated with cardiometabolic risk markers. However, lower snack quality (SDI range 1–11) was associated with higher blood markers, including elevated fasting triglycerides (TG (mmol/L) β; – 0.02, P = 0.02), postprandial TGs (6hiAUC (mmol/L.s); β; – 400, P = 0.01), fasting insulin (mIU/L) (β; – 0.15, P = 0.04), insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; β; – 0.04, P = 0.04) and hunger (scale 0–100) (β; – 0.52, P = 0.02) (P values non-significant after multiple testing adjustments). Late-evening snacking (≥ 9 pm; 31%) was associated with lower blood markers (HbA1c; 5.54 ± 0.42% vs 5.46 ± 0.28%, glucose 2hiAUC; 8212 ± 5559 vs 7321 ± 4928 mmol/L.s, P = 0.01 and TG 6hiAUC; 11,638 ± 8166 vs 9781 ± 6997 mmol/L.s, P = 0.01) compared to all other snacking times (HbA1c remained significant after multiple testing).
Conclusion
Snack quality and timing of consumption are simple diet features which may be targeted to improve diet quality, with potential health benefits.
Clinical trial registry number and website
NCT03479866, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03479866?term=NCT03479866&draw=2&rank=1
Funder
Wellcome Trust
Medical Research Council
Versus Arthritis
European Union Horizon 2020
Chronic Disease Research Foundation
ZOE Ltd
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN) and Biomedical Research Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference69 articles.
1. Garriguet D (2007) Canadians’ eating habits. Health Rep 18(2):17–32
2. Piernas C, Popkin BM (2010) Snacking increased among U.S. adults between 1977 and 2006. J Nutr 140:325–332. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.112763
3. UK Government (2018) The Eatwell Guide. Version current 25 September 2018. Internet: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-eatwell-guide. Accessed Mar 2014
4. Ovaskainen ML, Tapanainen H, Pakkala H (2010) Changes in the contribution of snacks to the daily energy intake of Finnish adults. Appetite 54:623–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.03.012
5. Ma Y, Bertone ER, Stanek EJ III, Reed GW, Hebert JR, Cohen NL, Merriam PA, Ockene IS (2003) Association between eating patterns and obesity in a free-living US adult population. Am J Epidemiol 158:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg117