Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To determine the effects of dietary sugar or carbohydrate restriction on physical activity energy expenditure, energy intake, and physiological outcomes across 24 h.
Methods
In a randomized, open-label crossover design, twenty-five healthy men (n = 10) and women (n = 15) consumed three diets over a 24-h period: moderate carbohydrate and sugar content (MODSUG = 50% carbohydrate [20% sugars], 15% protein, 35% fat); low sugar content (LOWSUG = 50% carbohydrate [< 5% sugars], 15% protein, 35% fat); and low carbohydrate content (LOWCHO = 8% carbohydrate [< 5% sugars], 15% protein, 77% fat). Postprandial metabolic responses to a prescribed breakfast (20% EI) were monitored under laboratory conditions before an ad libitum test lunch, with subsequent diet and physical activity monitoring under free-living conditions until blood sample collection the following morning.
Results
The MODSUG, LOWSUG and LOWCHO diets resulted in similar mean [95%CI] rates of both physical activity energy expenditure (771 [624, 919] vs. 677 [565, 789] vs. 802 [614, 991] kcal·d−1; p = 0.29] and energy intake (2071 [1794, 2347] vs. 2195 [1918, 2473] vs. 2194 [1890, 2498] kcal·d−1; P = 0.34), respectively. The LOWCHO condition elicited the lowest glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to breakfast (P < 0.01) but the highest 24-h increase in LDL-cholesterol concentrations (P < 0.001), with no differences between the MODSUG and LOWSUG treatments. Leptin concentrations decreased over 24-h of consuming LOWCHO relative to LOWSUG (p < 0.01).
Conclusion
When energy density is controlled for, restricting either sugar or total dietary carbohydrate does not modulate physical activity level or energy intake over a 24-h period (~ 19-h free-living) despite substantial metabolic changes.
Clinical trials registration ID
NCT03509610, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03509610
Funder
Rank Prize Funds
Knowledge Centre Sugar & Nutrition
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference64 articles.
1. Roberts C, Steer T, Maplethorpe N, Cox L, Meadows S, Nicholson S, Page P, Swan G (2018) National diet and nutrition survey: results from years 7 and 8 (combined) of the rolling programme (2014/2015 to 2015/2016). Public Health England, London
2. Shan Z, Rehm CD, Rogers G, Ruan M, Wang DD, Hu FB, Mozaffarian D, Zhang FF, Bhupathiraju SN (2019) Trends in dietary carbohydrate, protein, and fat intake and diet quality among US adults, 1999–2016. JAMA 322(12):1178–1187. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.13771
3. van Rossum CTM, Buurma-Rethans EJM, Dinnissen CS, Beukers MH, Brants HAM, Dekkers ALM, Ocké MC (2020) The diet of the Dutch: results of the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2012–2016. RIVM report 2020–2016, Bilthoven
4. Mikkelsen KH, Seifert T, Secher NH, Grondal T, van Hall G (2015) Systemic, cerebral and skeletal muscle ketone body and energy metabolism during acute hyper-D-beta-hydroxybutyratemia in post-absorptive healthy males. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(2):636–643. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2608
5. Moller N (2020) Ketone body, 3-hydroxybutyrate: minor metabolite–major medical manifestations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa370
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献