Abstract
AbstractThe ever-increasing anthropogenic activities that pose a significant threat to environmental security and sustainability have spurred geophysicists to review enhance geophysical techniques for shallow geophysical investigations, especially in identifying illegal buried materials. This article applied very low-frequency electromagnetic (VLF-EM) at an experimental geophysical site (EGS) to examine the geophysical response over various buried targets. The VLF-EM data acquired on the site with and without buried targets demonstrate the nature of the anomalies and the characteristic signals of the buried targets. There are significant variations in the anomalies source-bodied between the site with and without buried targets. The result of the pre-burial investigation shows no major contrast in the equivalent current density values across the site without targets. Minors and major anomalies were encountered after burying the targets corresponding to the buried targets. Some signals become stronger over a large buried target. However, there were a few undetected targets and some cases of unsatisfied results, which were also discussed. The performance of the VLF-EM method in terms of depth estimation was also examined. A significant variation was noted due to the presence of the buried targets and it was noted that the current density seems to always emerge maximally and minimally around the conductor targets and non-conductive targets, respectively. The failure of the VLF-EM to detect the buried pipes in various orientations was examined. The VLF-EM method is more consistent at small spacing and it can be very useful for identifying underground metallic and non-metallic targets. The study successfully provides useful information to complement the complexity of the use of geophysical methods while enhancing the subsurface information and understanding of VLF-EM anomalies or responses generated by various targets such as subsurface geological structures, buried waste contaminants and underground utilities to boost environmental studies and engineering investigations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Alao JO, Lawal KM, Dewu B, Raimi J. The evolving roles of geophysical test sites in engineering, science and technology. Acta Geophys. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01096-3.
2. Chung SG, Giao PH, Tanaka H. Geotechnical characteristics and engineering problems of,” Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, ISBN 90-5809-537-1, pp 505–541, 2003.
3. Rosado-Fuentes A, Ceballosb AA, Quinterob EH, Galvánb CA, Corralesb JL, Péreza GM. Geophysical characterization, design and construction of the Teoloyucan geophysical test site for archaeological and engineering applications, Central Mexico. J Appl Geophys. 2021;194: 104459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104459.
4. Marchetti M, Cafarella L, Di Mauro D, Zirizzotti A. Ground magnetometric survey and integrated geophysical methods for solid buried waste detection: a case study. Ann Geophys. 2002;45(3–4):563–73.
5. Al-Tarazi E, Abu Rajab J, Al-Naqa A, El-Waheidi M. Detecting leachate plumes and groundwater pollution at Ruseifa municipal landfill utilizing VLF-EM method. J Appl Geophys. 2008;65:121–31.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献