A review of excluded groups and non-response in population-based mental health surveys from high-income countries

Author:

Wright Eryn,Pagliaro Claudia,Page Imogen S.,Diminic Sandra

Abstract

Abstract National mental health surveys play a critical role in determining the prevalence of mental disorders in a population and informing service planning. However, current surveys have important limitations, including the exclusion of key vulnerable groups and increasing rates of non-response. This review aims to synthesise information on excluded and undersampled groups in national mental health surveys. We conducted a targeted review of nationally representative adult mental health surveys performed between 2005 and 2019 in high-income OECD countries. Sixteen surveys met our inclusion criteria. The response rate for included surveys ranged between 36.3% and 80.0%. The most frequently excluded groups included people who were homeless, people in hospitals or health facilities and people in correctional facilities. Males and young people were the most commonly underrepresented groups among respondents. Attempts to collect data from non-responders and excluded populations were limited, but suggest that mental health status differs among some of these cohorts. The exclusion of key vulnerable groups and high rates of non-response have important implications for interpreting and using the results of national mental health surveys. Targeted supplementary surveys of excluded or hard-to-reach populations, more inclusive sampling methodologies, and strategies aimed at improving response rates should be considered to strengthen the accuracy and usefulness of survey findings.

Funder

The University of Queensland

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Social Psychology,Health (social science),Epidemiology

Reference107 articles.

1. Kessler RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Chatterji S, Lee S, Ustün TB (2009) The WHO world mental health (WMH) surveys. Psychiatrie (Stuttg) 6(1):5–9

2. Weinberg L, Whiteford H, de Almeida JC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Levinson D, O’Neill S, Kovess-Masfety V (2012) Translation of the world mental health survey data to policies: an exploratory study of Stakeholders’ perceptions of how epidemiologic data can be utilized for policy in the field of mental health. Public Health Rev 34(2):4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391672

3. Chisholm D, Heslin M, Docrat S, Nanda S, Shidhaye R, Upadhaya N, Jordans M, Abdulmalik J, Olayiwola S, Gureje O, Kizza D, Mugisha J, Kigozi F, Hanlon C, Adugna M, Sanders R, Pretorius C, Thornicroft G, Lund C (2017) Scaling-up services for psychosis, depression and epilepsy in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: development and application of a mental health systems planning tool (OneHealth). Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 26(3):234–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796016000408

4. Diminic S, Page I, Gossip K, Comben C, Wright E, Pagliaro C, John J (2022) Technical Appendices for the Introduction to the National Mental Health Service Planning Framework – Commissioned by the Australian Government Department of Health. Version AUS V4.1. The University of Queensland, Brisbane

5. Wright E, Leitch E, Fjeldsoe K, Diminic S, Gossip K, Hudson P, Whiteford H (2021) Using the national mental health service planning framework to support an integrated approach to regional mental health planning in Queensland. Australia Aust J Primary Health 27(2):109–115

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3