Effects of psychological treatments on functioning in people with Schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Bighelli IreneORCID,Wallis Sofia,Reitmeir Cornelia,Schwermann Felicitas,Salahuddin Nurul Husna,Leucht Stefan

Abstract

AbstractFunctioning is recognized as a key treatment goal in alleviating the burden of schizophrenia. Psychological interventions can play an important role in improving functioning in this population, but the evidence on their efficacy is limited. We therefore aimed to evaluate the effect of psychological interventions in functioning for patients with schizophrenia. To conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, BIOSIS, Cochrane Library, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov and the Study register of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group. The outcome functioning was measured with validated scales. We performed random-effects pairwise meta-analysis to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 58 RCTs (5048 participants). Psychological interventions analyzed together (SMD =  – 0.37, 95% CI  – 0.49 to  – 0.25), cognitive behavioral therapy (30 RCTs, SMD =  – 0.26, 95% CI  – 0.39 to  – 0.12), and third wave cognitive-behavioral therapies (15 RCTs, SMD =  – 0.60, 95% CI  – 0.83 to  – 0.37) were superior to control in improving functioning, while creative therapies (8 RCTs, SMD = 0.01, 95% CI  – 0.38 to 0.39), integrated therapies (4 RCTs, SMD =  – 0.21, 95% CI  – 1.20 to 0.78) and other therapies (4 RCTs, SMD =  – 0.74, 95% CI  – 1.52 to 0.04) did not show a benefit. Psychological interventions, in particular cognitive behavioral therapy and third wave cognitive behavioral therapies, have shown a therapeutic effect on functioning. The confidence in the estimate was evaluated as very low due to risk of bias, heterogeneity and possible publication bias.

Funder

h2020 marie skłodowska-curie actions

Technische Universität München

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The schizophrenia syndrome, circa 2024: What we know and how that informs its nature;Schizophrenia Research;2024-02

2. Exploring Personal Recovery in Schizophrenia: The Role of Mentalization;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2023-06-16

3. Introduction for the follow-up of the Eighth International Kraepelin Symposium at LMU Munich;European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience;2023-05-18

4. Meta-cognitive training for schizophrenia;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2023-03-20

5. A Systematic Review on Add-On Psychotherapy in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2023-01-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3