The role of individual decision-making in the manufacturing of bone retouchers

Author:

Martellotta Eva Francesca,Zinnarello Valerio Giuliano,Peresani Marco

Abstract

AbstractBone retouchers, while often underrated, stand out as widespread tools throughout the Palaeolithic, typically linked to breaking bones for marrow extraction. Although bone retouchers are commonly considered a by-product of butchering activities, the possibility of intentional manufacturing has been rarely considered but should not be dismissed. In our experimental protocol, we explore decision-making processes involved in manufacturing bone retouchers, focusing on how these decisions are guided by intentional production rather than solely marrow extraction. The results indicate that individuals employ specific techniques and make technological decisions, rapidly acquiring experience in retoucher manufacturing that extends beyond mere intuition. The choice of bone-breaking technique(s) reflects the intention behind either marrow extraction or producing suitable bone fragments for retouchers. This decision-making process is heavily influenced by the morphology of the bone, presenting challenges that individuals learn to overcome during the experiment. The analysis of the experimental percussion marks suggests that certain marks on specific skeletal elements indicate intentional bone retoucher manufacturing. We then propose a likelihood grid to assess the reliability of traces on each skeletal element in inferring intentional manufacturing. Given the abundance of bone retouchers in Middle Palaeolithic contexts, a thorough investigation into the intentionality behind their manufacturing processes could significantly impact their relevance within other Palaeolithic bone industries.

Funder

Griffith University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference77 articles.

1. Abrams G, Bello SM, Di Modica K, Pirson S, Bonjean D (2014) When Neanderthals used cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) remains: bone retouchers from unit 5 of Scladina Cave (Belgium). Quat Int 326–327:274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.022

2. Alhaique F (1997) Do patterns of bone breakage differ between cooked and uncooked bones? An experimental approach. Anthropozoologica 25–26:49–56

3. Alonso-García P, Navazo Ruiz M, Blasco R (2020) Use and selection of bone fragments in the north of the Iberian Peninsula during the Middle Palaeolithic: bone retouchers from level 4 of Prado Vargas (Burgos, Spain). Archaeol Anthrop Sci 12(9):1–12

4. Anconetani P, Ferrari M, Giusberti G, Peretto C (1995) Analisi dei resti ossei fratturati intenzionalmente del giacimento di Isernia La Pineta (Molise, Italia): i reperti della porzione più profonda dell'archeosuperficie T. 3A del I settore di scavo. In: Peretto R

5. (ed) Atti del 1° Convegno nazionale di archeozoologia (Rovigo, 5-7 marzo 1993). Ist. Editoriali e Poligrafici, Pisa-Roma, pp 55-63

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3