Abstract
AbstractAn emerging field of research suggests that the policy and societal pressures for a green transition represent a “green window of opportunity” for peripheral regions. These regions often lag behind in overall innovation performance and may suffer from being places that don’t matter. At the same time, these are exactly the regions that the European Union is trying to support through several programmes, including Horizon Europe. This paper investigates the participation of organisations from peripheral regions in environmental projects funded by the Horizon Europe programme. To account for the multidimensional nature of regional peripherality, we define peripheral regions from a geographical, innovation and socio-economic perspective. We then analyse the relationship between these dimensions of regional peripherality and the extent to which regions benefit from Horizon environmental innovation projects in terms of participation, amount of funding and position in the overall network of project consortia.Our findings show a greater participation in Horizon environmental innovation projects for regions in Southern and Northern Europe, while within-country peripherality is negatively related to participation. At the same time, regions that are lagging in terms of innovation and socio-economic performance also receive less of this specific funding. Overall, geographical peripherality only tells a part of the story as several “places that don’t matter” for innovation and economic dynamism are also unable to benefit from these specific green windows of opportunity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Amoroso S, Coad A, Grassano N (2017) European R&D networks: a snapshot from the 7th EU framework programme. In: JRC working papers on corporate R&D and innovation, p 2017–05. (https://ideas.repec.org//p/ipt/wpaper/201705.html)
2. Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Massard N, Frachisse D (2007) Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Pap Reg Sci 86:495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00132.x
3. Balland P‑A (2012) Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry. Reg Stud 46:741–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.529121
4. Balland P‑A, Boschma R (2021) Complementary interregional linkages and Smart Specialisation: an empirical study on European regions. Reg Stud 55:1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861240
5. Balland P‑A, Boschma R, Ravet J (2019) Network dynamics in collaborative research in the EU, 2003–2017. Eur Plan Stud 27:1811–1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1641187
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献