Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. Agudo, J. D. D. M. (2019). Which instructional programme (EFL or CLIL) results in better oral communicative competence? Updated empirical evidence from a monolingual context. Linguistics and Education, 51, 69–78.
2. Amanti, C. (2019). The (invisible) work of dual language bilingual education teachers. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(4), 455–470.
3. An, J., Macaro, E., & Childs, A. (2021). Classroom interaction in EMI high schools: Do teachers who are native speakers of English make a difference? System, 98, 102482.
4. Bakken, J., & Brevik, L. M. (2023). Challenging the notion of CLIL elitism: A study of secondary school students’ motivation for choosing CLIL in Norway. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1091–1114.
5. Balbay, S., Pamuk, I., Temir, T., & Doğan, C. (2018). Issues in pre-service and in-service teacher-training programs for university English instructors in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 48–60.