MRI and pathology comparisons in Rasmussen’s encephalitis: a multi-institutional examination of hemispherotomy outcomes relative to imaging and histological severity

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Rasmussen encephalitis (RE) is a very rare chronic neurological disorder of unilateral inflammation of the cerebral cortex. Hemispherotomy provides the best chance at achieving seizure freedom in RE patients, but with significant risks and variable long-term outcomes. The goal of this study is to utilize our multicenter pediatric cohort to characterize if differences in pathology and/or imaging characterization of RE may provide a window into post-operative seizure outcomes, which in turn could guide decision-making for parents and healthcare providers. Methods This multi-institutional retrospective review of medical record, imaging, and pathology samples was approved by each individual institution’s review board. Data was collected from all known pediatric cases of peri-insular functional hemispherotomy from the earliest available electronic medical records. Mean follow-up time was 4.9 years. Clinical outcomes were measured by last follow-up visit using both Engel and ILAE scoring systems. Relationships between categorical and continuous variables were analyzed with Pearson correlation values. Results Twenty-seven patients met study criteria. No statistically significant correlations existed between patient imaging and pathology data. Pathology stage, MRI brain imaging stages, and a combined assessment of pathology and imaging stages showed no statistically significant correlation to post-operative seizure freedom rates. Hemispherectomy Outcome Prediction Scale scoring demonstrated seizure freedom in only 71% of patients receiving a score of 1 and 36% of patients receiving a score of 2 which were substantially lower than predicted. Conclusions Our analysis did not find evidence for either independent or combined analysis of imaging and pathology staging being predictive for post peri-insular hemispherotomy seizure outcomes, prompting the need for other biomarkers to be explored. Our data stands in contrast to the recently proposed Hemispherectomy Outcome Prediction Scale and does not externally validate this metric for an RE cohort.