Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses

Published:2024-04-12 Issue:5 Volume:49 Page:1512-1521
ISSN:2366-0058
Container-title:Abdominal Radiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Abdom Radiol

Author:

Kaur Gurkawal,Manchanda Smita^ORCID,Sharma Raju,Vyas Surabhi,Kandasamy Devasenathipathy,Hari Smriti,Bhatla Neerja,Mathur Sandeep R.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-024-04292-x.pdf

Reference18 articles.

1. Forstner R, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cunha TM, Kinkel K, Masselli G, Kubik-Huch R, et al. ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(6):2248–57.

2. Iima M, Le Bihan D. Clinical Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion MR Imaging: Past, Present, and Future. Radiology. 2016;278(1):13–32.

3. Li HM, Zhao SH, Qiang JW, Zhang GF, Feng F, Ma FH, et al. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumours: A correlation with Ki-67 expression: DKI for Differentiating BEOT From MEOT. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(5):1499–506.

4. Mokry T, Mlynarska-Bujny A, Kuder TA, Hasse FC, Hog R, Wallwiener M, et al. Ultra-High- b -Value Kurtosis Imaging for Noninvasive Tissue Characterization of Ovarian Lesions. Radiology. 2020;296(2):358–69.

5. Steven AJ, Zhuo J, Melhem ER. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: An Emerging Technique for Evaluating the Microstructural Environment of the Brain. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014;202(1):W26–33.