Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
New informatics tools can transform evidence-based information to individualized predictive reports to serve shared decisions in clinic. We developed a web-based system to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and medical risk factors and to compare responses to national registry data. The system generates predicted outcomes for individual patients and a report for use in clinic to support decisions. We present the report development, presentation, and early experience implementing this PRO-based, shared decision report for knee and hip arthritis patients seeking orthopedic evaluation.
Methods
Iterative patient and clinician interviews defined report content and visual display. The web-system supports: (a) collection of PROs and risk data at home or in office, (b) automated statistical processing of responses compared to national data, (c) individualized estimates of likely pain relief and functional gain if surgery is elected, and (d) graphical reports to support shared decisions. The system was implemented at 12 sites with 26 surgeons in an ongoing cluster randomized trial.
Results
Clinicians and patients recommended that pain and function as well as clinical risk factors (e.g., BMI, smoking) be presented to frame the discussion. Color and graphics support patient understanding. To date, 7891 patients completed the assessment before the visit and 56% consented to study participation. Reports were generated for 98% of patients and 68% of patients recalled reviewing the report with their surgeon.
Conclusions
Informatics solutions can generate timely, tailored office reports including PROs and predictive analytics. Patients successfully complete the pre-visit PRO assessments and clinicians and patients value the report to support shared surgical decisions.
Funder
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference29 articles.
1. Sherman, R. E., Anderson, S. A., Dal Pan, G. J., et al. (2016). Real-world evidence—What is it and what can it tell us? New England Journal of Medicine, 375, 2293–2297. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1609216.
2. Sinaiko, A. D., Szumigalski, K., Eastman, D., & Chien, A. T. (2019). Delivery of patient centered care in the U.S. Health Care System: What is standing in its way? In: Academy Health. Retrieved October 30, 2019 from https://www.academyhealth.org/sites/default/files/deliverypatientcenteredcare_august2019.pdf
3. Lavallee, D. C., Austin, E., & Franklin, P. D. (2018). How can health systems advance patient-reported outcome measurement? The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 44(8), 439–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.05.005.
4. Elwyn, G., Nelson, E., Hager, A., et al. (2019). Coproduction: When users define quality. BMJ Quality & Safety. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009830.
5. Pan, F., Tian, J., Munugoda, I. P., Graves, S., Lorimer, M., Cicuttini, F., et al. (2020). Do knee pain phenotypes have different risks of total knee replacement? Journal of Clinical Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030632.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献