Feasibility study on virtual reality-based training for skin cancer screening: Bridging the gap in dermatological education
-
Published:2024-09-10
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1360-2357
-
Container-title:Education and Information Technologies
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Educ Inf Technol
Author:
Mergen MarvinORCID, Will Lisa, Graf NorbertORCID, Meyerheim MarcelORCID
Abstract
AbstractDespite growing interest in the inclusion of virtual reality (VR) in medical education, its full potential for immersive and interactive training remains underutilized, particularly in dermatology. As part of a multidisciplinary project, we tested the feasibility of integrating a VR training scenario for a complete skin cancer screening into the curriculum with 58 medical students. The evaluation focused on simulation usability, cognitive task load, immersion, change in perceived competence, suitability, and cybersickness using established and adapted questionnaires. Participants reported rather high levels of system usability and immersion and medium cognitive task load. Self-assessed competence in performing a skin cancer screening increased significantly after the training simulation.Prior skin cancer screening experience correlated positively with self-assessed competence and theoretical knowledge, which themselves were neither related to gender nor age. Age correlated negatively with perceived usability and immersion, enjoyment of learning during the simulation and assessed appropriateness of the simulation to learn a dermatological full-body examination while being positively correlated with perceived cybersickness. Gender was significantly associated with the need for technical help during the simulation and openness to new technologies.As a blueprint of a feasibility evaluation, this study can contribute to further refinement of the presented and relatable VR applications in medical curricula.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Abbas, J. R., Chu, M. M. H., Jeyarajah, C., Isba, R., Payton, A., McGrath, B., Tolley, N., & Bruce, I. (2023). Virtual reality in simulation-based emergency skills training: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Resuscitation plus, 16, 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100484 2. Abundez Toledo, M., Ghanem, G., Fine, S., Weisman, D., Huang, Y. M., & Rouhani, A. A. (2024). Exploring the promise of virtual reality in enhancing anatomy education: A focus group study with medical students. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1369794 3. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.5555/2835587.2835589 4. Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Garcia-Palacios, A., Villa, H., Perpiña, C., & Alcañiz, M. (2000). Presence and reality judgment in virtual environments: A unitary construct? Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310050078760 5. Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., Kemper, C. J., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung subjektiver Kompetenzerwartungen: Allgemeine Selbstwirksamkeit Kurzskala (ASKU). GESIS-Working Papers, 2012/17, 24.
|
|