Abstract
AbstractGender affirming hormone treatment is an important part of the care of trans adolescents which enables them to develop the secondary sexual characteristics congruent with their identified genders. There is an increasing amount of empirical evidence showing the benefits of gender affirming hormone treatment for psychological health and social well-being in this population. However, in several countries, access to gender affirming hormone treatment for trans adolescents has recently been severely restricted. While much of the opposition to gender affirming hormone treatment for trans adolescents has in part been ideologically motivated, it also reflects a debate about whether there are harms that outweigh the benefits of the treatment. Accordingly, a systematic and comprehensive philosophical analysis of the ethics of gender affirming hormone treatment for trans adolescents is needed. Herein, I offer such an analysis that draws on the four principles of biomedical ethics by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress. Based on the considerations of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, I argue that the provision of access to gender affirming hormone treatment for consenting trans adolescents is ethically required and that the current restrictions to such treatment are ethically wrong.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science)
Reference116 articles.
1. Allen, L.R., L.B. Watson, A.M. Egan, and C.N. Moser. 2019. Well-being and suicidality among transgender youth after gender-affirming hormones. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology 7(3): 302–311.
2. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2022. Statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Oklahoma Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics on gender-affirming care. https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/news-releases/aap/2022/statement-from-the-american-academy-of-pediatrics-and-the-oklahoma-chapter-of-the-american-academy-of-pediatrics-on-gender-affirming-care/#:~:text=The%20American%20Academy%20of%20Pediatrics%2C%20along%20with%20its%20Oklahoma%20Chapter,transgender%20and%20gender%20diverse%20youth. Accessed May 9, 2023.
3. American College of Physicians. 2022. Attacks on gender-affirming and transgender health care. https://www.acponline.org/advocacy/state-health-policy/attacks-on-gender-affirming-and-transgender-health-care. Accessed May 9, 2023.
4. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
5. Anjum, R.L., and S.D. Mumford. 2017. A philosophical argument against evidence-based policy. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23(5): 1045–1050.