Migration as a Collective Project in the Global South: A Case Study from the Ethiopia–South Africa Corridor

Author:

Feyissa Dereje,Zeleke Meron,Gebresenbet Fana

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter critiques the individualist thrust in migration studies and the assumed “autonomous agency” of prospective migrants, especially in the context of the Global South. It recasts migration as a collective project through a case study of Hadiya migration to South Africa, the place of origin or most of Ethiopian migrants. The chapter makes the case for a processual understanding of migration rather than a synchronic approach with its nature changing on the “individualist-collectivist continuum” across time. It is argued that the success of Hadiya migration to South Africa is largely due to its collective nature at the various stages of migration processes—from decision-making, to the various forms of social support that enable cost sharing and ease the process of settlement at destination. At the same time however, the material wealth accumulated in South Africa, and the greed that underpins it, has contributed to the erosion of the collective imagination of social life and the increasing centrality of individualist perspectives, particularly viewed in businesses and investments. As such, the collective benefits accrued at early stages are now being lost and the negative consequences are becoming perceptible. The chapter concludes making a case for bringing in a temporal approach that examines changes in the individualist/collectivist conceptions of migratory agency at different phases of the migration experience.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference21 articles.

1. Adugna, F., Deshingkar, P., & Ayalew, T. (2019). Brokers, migrants, and the state: Berri Kefach “door openers” in Ethiopian Clandestine migration to South Africa. University of Sussex. Working Paper 56. https://hdl.handle.net/10779/uos.23472446.v1

2. Arango, J. (2000). Explaining migration: A critical view. International Social Science Journal, 52(165), 283–296.

3. Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In I. Berlin (Ed.), Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford University Press.

4. Cobbah, J. (1987). African values and the human rights debate: An African perspective. Human Rights Quarterly, 9(3), 309–331.

5. Cooper, B., & Esser, A. (2018). Remittances in Ethiopia: exploring barriers to remittances in sub-Saharan Africa (p. 4). Centre for Financial Regulation & Inclusion.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3