Abstract
AbstractThis chapter develops three comparative perspectives. Beginning with direct democracy, enhancing the direct participation of people as in Switzerland—considered revolutionary in the nineteenth century—may still be regarded a progressive form of democracy. But are increased political rights, offering the people not only a voice in electing their representatives but also a chance to decide major decisions directly, really an efficient way to improve democracy? The second perspective deals with federalism. Traditionally understood as a means for the vertical division of power within states, can it also play a role for the supranational division of power and the participation of minorities? The last section places political power-sharing in a context of conflict resolution, especially in multicultural societies. The chapter ends by stressing that power-sharing is not just an institutional arrangement, but that it also has to be based on the specific culture of a society that intends to practice it.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference118 articles.
1. Adeney, Katharine, and Wilfried Swenden. 2019. Power-Sharing in the World’s Largest Democracy: Informal Consociationalism in India (and Its Decline?). Swiss Political Science Review 25 (4): 450–475.
2. Altman, David. 2019. Citizenship and Contemporary: Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Anderson, George. 2008. Federalism: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Aubert, Jean-François, and Pascal Mahon. 2003. Petit commentaire de la Constitution Fédérale de la Confédération Suisse du 18 Avril 1999. Zurich: Schulthess.
5. Auer, Andreas. 1989. Le référendum et l’initiative populaire aux Etats-Unis. Basel: Helbing und Lichtenhahn.