Abstract
AbstractWhile detailed debates are underway about the scientific and ethical implications of genome editing, this chapter argues that greater attention should be paid to the patent policy issues that these technologies raise. The chapter argues that WTO Members need to consider urgently the implications of patenting genome editing inventions for human rights and the public interest, taking into account Article 27.2 of the TRIPS Agreement, which provides that Members may exclude from patentability inventions, the prevention within their territory of the commercial exploitation of which is necessary to protect ordre public or morality. Furthermore, while genome editing has great potential to transform healthcare and the wellbeing in society across a broad range of scientific fields, the granting of patent rights for these technologies will have profound implications for affordability and access, particularly for people living with chronic lifelong illnesses and for future generations not yet born who are at risk of inheriting preventable medical conditions from their parents. The chapter argues that WTO Members need to consider carefully the impact of granting of genome editing patents, balancing the need to reward inventorship while at the same time having regard to implications for affordability, access and the enjoyment of fundamental human rights.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference73 articles.
1. Akst J (2017) UC Berkeley Receives CRISPR Patent in Europe. Scientist (March 24, 2017), https://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/48987/title/UC-Berkeley-Receives-CRISPR- Patent-in-Europe/ (Last accessed 16 February 2021)
2. All European Academies (ALLEA) (2016) Statement on Patent-Related Aspects of CRISPR-Cas Technology
3. Allen & Overy (2021) Broad Institute CRISPR-Cas9 Patent Revoked in Europe, https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/news-and-insights/publications/broad-institute-crispr-cas9-patent-revoked-in-europe (Last accessed 16 February 2021)
4. Baltimore D et al (2015a) A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 348:36–38
5. Baltimore D, Berg P, Botchan M, Dana Carroll R, Charo A, Church G, Corn JE, Daley GQ, Doudna JA, Fenner M, Greely HT, Jinek M, Martin GS, Penhoet E, Puck J, Sternberg SH, Weissman JS, Yamamoto KR (2015b) A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 348(6230):365–338: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4394183/ (Last accessed 17 February 2021)