Leaving No One Behind in Research, and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma for Vulnerable Groups

Author:

Schroeder Doris,Chatfield Kate,Chennells Roger,Partington Hazel,Kimani Joshua,Thomson Gillian,Odhiambo Joyce Adhiambo,Snyders Leana,Louw Collin

Abstract

AbstractLeaving no one behind is the main transformative promise of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It encapsulates the 21st-century mission of inclusion. This chapter introduces the main mission of this book: leaving no one behind in research. It provides the context for all the chapters that follow by explaining what it means to leave no one behind in research, how the protection-inclusion dilemma for vulnerable groups and individuals is generated, and how risks and mistrust in research might be reduced. The book was written in collaboration with two groups who are traditionally labelled as highly vulnerable and are therefore often excluded from research: the South African San community and an impoverished sex worker community in Nairobi. Working closely throughout all research stages with the two communities, including co-authorship of this book, we prioritised research-participant needs over researcher needs, aiming for minimally risky and minimally burdensome research, as well as increased trust in researchers. This involved foregoing the collection of personal data and obtaining all research input through community researchers. It led to a potential alternative to exclusion from research, namely research led by vulnerable groups for vulnerable groups.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference69 articles.

1. Ballantyne A, Rogers W (2016) Pregnancy, vulnerability, and the risk of exploitation in clinical research. In: Baylis F, Ballantyne A (eds) Clinical research involving pregnant women. Research ethics forum, vol 3. Springer International, Cham, pp 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26512-4_8

2. Bhagwanjee S, Muckart DJ, Jeena PM, Moodley P (1997) Does HIV status influence the outcome of patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit? A Prospect Double Blind Stud BMJ (clin Res Ed) 314(7087):1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1077a

3. BMWK (n.d.) Our energy transition for an energy supply that is secure, clean, and affordable. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), Berlin. https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Dossier/energy-transition.html. Accessed 9 Feb 2024

4. Boynton MH, Portnoy DB, Johnson BT (2013) Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB: Ethics Human Res 35(2):7–13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4502434/. Accessed 9 Feb 2024

5. Bürgerbegehren Rettet den Dömlingsberg (n.d.) Soll so unser Mindelheimer Stadtwald zerstört werden? https://www.keine-windkraft-in-mindelheim.de/. Accessed 9 Feb 2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3