The Effects of Robotic Training on Walking and Functional Independence of People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Meta-regression

Author:

Köyhäjoki AnnaORCID,Korpi HilkkaORCID,Yli-Ikkelä RikuORCID,Hakonen HartoORCID,Kantola MirjamiORCID,Rintala AkiORCID,Honkanen SariORCID,Ilves OutiORCID,Sjögren TuulikkiORCID,Karvanen JuhaORCID,Aartolahti EevaORCID

Abstract

AbstractEvidence on the effects of robotic technology is required to develop rehabilitation services. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of robot-assisted walking training on walking and functional independence in everyday life in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and explore the covariates associated with these effects.We searched the MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases until March 25, 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion. We included RCTs on people with SCI receiving robotic training. The Cochrane RoB2, meta-analysis, meta-regression, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were performed.We included 23 RCTs focusing on SCI with outcomes of walking or functional independence, of which 14 were included in the meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses. Small improvements were observed in functional independence in favor of robot-assisted walking training compared to other physical exercises (Hedges’ g 0.31, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.59; I2 = 19.7%, 9 studies, 419 participants, low certainty evidence). There were no significant differences in walking ability, speed, endurance, or independence between the groups.Robot-assisted walking training may slightly improve functional independence, but its effects on walking ability in SCI patients is uncertain compared to other exercise. Evidence suggests little to no difference in walking independence, and the effects on walking speed and endurance are unclear. No clear evidence exists whether positive effects are linked to personal, clinical, or intervention characteristics. Robot-assisted gait training may be a viable option for improving functional independence in individuals with SCI.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference62 articles.

1. WHO: Spinal Cord Injury. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury

2. EuRobotics: Strategic Research Agenda for Robotics in Europe (2014)

3. Rymer, W.Z., Burt, S., Jayaraman, A.: 13 Advanced Rehabilitation Strategies for Individuals with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. In: Vialle, L.R., Fehlings, M., Weidner, N. (eds.) AOSpine Masters Series, pp. 163–178. Thieme (2017)

4. Ditunno, P.L., Patrick, M., Stineman, M., Ditunno, J.F.: Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 46, 500–506 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102172

5. Ditunno, P.L., Patrick, M., Stineman, M., Morganti, B., Townson, A.F., Ditunno, J.F.: Cross-cultural differences in preference for recovery of mobility among spinal cord injury rehabilitation professionals. Spinal Cord. 44, 567–575 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101876

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3