Getting It Right? The Site Selection Process for Canada’s High-level Nuclear Waste

Author:

Bratt DuaneORCID,Larkin PatriciaORCID,Deschênes-Philion Xavier

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter focuses on assessment and risk management of the site selection process for Canada’s permanent high-level waste management facility for used nuclear fuel. It also examines the risk management approach related to the development of the transportation routes that will be needed to carry used nuclear fuel to the permanent deep geological repository (DGR). There are several types of risks (technological, environmental, human health, political, security, and financial) and uncertainties (epistemic, semantic, and normative) that exist in this case. Our goal is to better understand how those different risks and uncertainties are assessed by different groups (in particular the lay public, stakeholders, and experts) and handled by the risk managers. The REACT (regulatory, economic, advisory, community-based, and technology) framework is used to assess risk management practices for siting a location for high-level nuclear waste. After a general introduction to the case, three descriptive sections provide the level of individuals’ affectedness, the types of risk management intervention tools, and the level of democratization in the case. A particular emphasis is on the public consultation process for communities interested in hosting the DGR.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference53 articles.

1. Aecom Canada Ltd. 2009. The Summary of Economic Benefits Linked to Adaptive Phased Management at an Economic Region Level.

2. Aecom Canada Ltd. 2010. “A Preliminary Assessment of Illustrative Generic Community Economic Benefits from Hosting the APM Project.” NWMO SR-2010-09. May 2010.

3. Assembly of First Nations (AFN). 2005. Nuclear Fuel Waste Dialogue. Recommendations to the Nuclear Waste Management Organization. September 30, 2005.

4. Bourassa, Maureen, Kelton Doraty, Loleen Berdahl, Jana Fried, Scott Bell. 2016. “Support, Opposition, Emotion and Contentious Issue Risk Perception.” International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 201–216.

5. Bovens, Mark. 2005. “Public Accountability.” in Ferlie, Ewan, Flynn, Laurence E. Jr., and Pollitt, Christophe (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford University Press: 182–208.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3