Abstract
AbstractWe investigate differential responses by gender to competitive persuasion in political campaigns. We implemented a survey and a field experiment during two mayoral elections in Italy. Eligible voters were exposed to a positive or negative campaign by an opponent. The survey experiment used on-line videos and slogans. The field experiment used door-to-door canvassing. In both experiments, gender differences emerge. Females vote more for the opponent and less for the incumbent when exposed to positive—as opposed to negative—campaigning. Males do the opposite. These differences cannot be explained by gender identification, ideology, or other voters’ observable attributes.
Funder
European Research Council
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.
2. Alexander, A. C., Bågenholm, A., & Charron, N. (2020). Are women more likely to throw the rascals out? The mobilizing effect of social service spending on female voters. Public Choice, 184, 235–261.
3. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A., & Valentino, N. (1994). Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review, 88(4), 829–838.
4. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. The Free Press.
5. Arceneaux, K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2010). Comparing negative and positive campaign messages. American Politics Research, 38(1), 54–83.