Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification

Published:2022-11-30 Issue:2 Volume:128 Page:1459-1461
ISSN:0138-9130
Container-title:Scientometrics
language:en
Short-container-title:Scientometrics

Author:

Abramo Giovanni,Aguillo Isidro F.,Aksnes Dag W.,Boyack Kevin,Burrell Quentin L.,Campanario Juan Miguel,Chinchilla-Rodríguez Zaida,Costas Rodrigo^ORCID,D’Angelo Ciriaco Andrea,Harzing Anne-Wil,Jamali Hamid R.,Larivière Vincent,Leydesdorff Loet,Luwel Marc,Martin Ben,Mayr Philipp,McCain Katherine W.,Peters Isabella,Rafols Ismael,Robinson-Garcia Nicolas,Schubert Torben,Small Henry,Sugimoto Cassidy R.,Thelwall Mike,van den Besselaar Peter,van Leeuwen Thed,Waltman Ludo

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-022-04565-6.pdf

Reference5 articles.

1. Macháček, V., & Srholec, M. (2021a). Retracted Article: Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences. Scientometrics, 126, 1897–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4

2. Macháček, V., & Srholec, M. (2021b). Retraction Note to: Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences. Scientometrics, 127, 1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04149-w

3. Mills, D., & Bell, K. (2021). National propensities? Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04014-w

4. Oransky, I. (2021). Authors object after Springer Nature journal cedes to publisher Frontiers’ demand for retraction. Retraction Watch. Retrieved September 7, 2021, from https://retractionwatch.com/2021/09/07/authors-object-after-springer-nature-journal-cedes-to-publisher-frontiers-demand-for-retraction/

5. Srholec, M., & Macháček, V. (2021). On national propensities to predatory publishing: A response to the comments of Mills and Bell. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04015-9

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. What if your paper were retracted for no credible reason?;Research Evaluation;2024-04-19

2. Measures to Protect Ethical Publications Getting Trapped Under Unethical Practices: Preying by Predatory Journals;Springer International Handbooks of Education;2024

3. Science overlay maps: A tribute to Loet Leydesdorff;El Profesional de la información;2023-12-29

4. The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions;Journal of Informetrics;2023-08

5. Sorting out journals: The proliferation of journal lists in China;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2023-07-13