Abstract
AbstractAn overall rise in the citation parameters used in the metrics of scientific publications (i.e. journal impact factor, JIF) has taken place since the last decade of the previous century, coinciding with the electronic distribution of (and access to) scientific literature. This inflation like tendency is herein analyzed in the area of Materials Science and also affects the number of publications. Considering average JIF values, its growth is proportional to the number of publications in the area and to its JIF value, leading to an inhomogeneous boost that preferentially benefits those journals with high JIF. An elevation in the number of publications per year alone cannot explain this behavior but it occurs due to a continuous and widespread increment in the number of citations per article, which only remains limited when restrictions are applied by journals to the maximum number of pages per article. In this work we observe this positive correlation between the increase in the number of references per article and the overall increase in JIF but, in our analysis, a kink point is observed in consistency with the appearance of online databases, particularly those free available in 2004. Online databases along with the widespread of open access publishing option made the research content easily available to the scientific community contributing to an increasing trend (without apparent saturation) in the number of articles used to contextualize the new scientific contributions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference46 articles.
1. Althouse, B. M., West, J. D., Bergstrom, T., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20936
2. Baas, J., Fennell, C. (2019) When peer reviewers go rogue - Estimated prevalence of citation manipulation by reviewers based on the citation patterns of 69,000 reviewers, 17th International Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics (ISSI) on Scientometrics and Informetrics, I, pp.963–974
3. Bray, N. J., & Major, C. H. (2022). Impact factors, altmetrics, and prestige, oh my: The relationship between perceived prestige and objective measures of journal quality. Innovative Higher Education, 47, 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09635-4
4. Cantu-Ortiz, F. J. (2018). Research analytics. boosting university productivity and competitiveness through scientometrics. CRC Press.
5. Collins, M. P., & Berge, Z. L. (1994). IPCT journal: A case study of an electronic journal on the internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 771–776.