Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between green industrial policies and domestic biofuel production among OECD countries. The analysis builds on a data set including 24 OECD countries over the time period 2000–2016. This panel is estimated using a variant of the so-called Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood model and includes the mix of demand-pull (biofuel blending mandates) and technology-push policies (government R&D), as well as the interaction between these two types of instruments. The results suggest a positive relationship between blending mandates and domestic biofuel production. Thus, a more stringent blending mandate does not only increase the use of biofuels, but also domestic production (as a share of total fuel use). Government R&D has not, however, induced domestic biofuel industrialization processes. The results even suggest a negative interaction effect between government R&D and blending mandates, in turn implying that these two polices target different technological fields. The blending mandates tend to primarily favor commercialized first-generation biofuels, while government support to biofuel R&D has instead been focused on advanced biofuel technology.
Funder
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Energimyndigheten
Lulea University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference134 articles.
1. Aalbers R, Shestalova V, Kocsis V (2013) Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector. Energy Policy 63:1240–1250
2. Ackrill R, Kay A (2014) The growth of biofuels in the 21st century policy drivers and market challenges, 1st edn. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London
3. Altenburg T, Assmann C (2017) Green industrial policy; concepts, policies, country experiences. UN Environment and German Development Institute, Geneva and Bonn
4. Arnold M, Tainter JA, Strumsky D (2019) Productivity of innovation in biofuel technologies. Energy Policy 124:54–62
5. Arrow KJ, Cohen L, David PA, Hahn RW, Kolstad CD, Lane L, Montgomery WD, Nelson RR, Noll RG, Smith AE (2009) A statement on the appropriate role for research and development in climate policy. Econ Voice 6:6–6
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献