DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF PRE-SELECTED BEAM ORIENTATION AND BEAM ANGLE OPTIMIZATION IN INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY PLANS FOR NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA.

Author:

A K Anjana1,N S Silambarasan2,Nigam Jitendra3,S Navitha2,Kumar Piyush4

Affiliation:

1. Intern Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP

2. Assistant Professor cum Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP.

3. Assistant Professor cum Chief Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP.

4. Professor and Head, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP

Abstract

Purpose: This study is intended to verify and analyze the dosimetric impact of Pre selected beam orientation (PSBO) and Beam angle optimization (BAO) in IMRT for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Twenty patients of Nasopharyngeal carcinom Materials and Methods: a treated with IMRT Plans were recruited for this retrospective study. Varian Medical systems treatment planning systems (TPS), Eclipse of version 13.6 were used for planning. All twenty patients were treated with IMRT plan created by PSBO while choosing beam angle. Another plan using BAO used for choosing beam angles followed by PRO optimization for inverse planning were created. Objectives of PTV and OARs are maintained constant in both the plans. Statistical analyses of both the plans were performed using parameters; Paddick conformity index (PCI), Homogeneity index (HI), Dose delivered to OAR and Delivered MU. The statistical data were analyzed by Student t test. In this study, out of twenty patients, Result: seventeen patients BAO were valid for inverse planning optimization. For three patients beam angles chosen by BAO were invalid. And the dosimetric comparison of seventeen patients between BAO and PSBO was showing similar results except for MU. The p value obtained for all the parameters except MU, were >0.05. On taking into consideration of delivered MU, PSBO has lesser MU than BAO and are statistically signicant. Conclusion: On reviewing the results, it is concluded that both BAO and PSBO are clinically acceptable. But on concerning the delivered MU, PSBO seems to be better method than BAO. Also, it should be taken into account that three of the plans have been failed to optimize in BAO, since the beam angles suggested in this BAO method does not account the limitations of machine. It shows the advantage of PSBO over BAO. Hence, we can conclude that PSBO is a better method in selection of beam angles in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma cases.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Subject

Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Communication,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Molecular Biology,Molecular Biology,Structural Biology,Catalysis,General Engineering,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Process Chemistry and Technology,Catalysis,Process Chemistry and Technology,Biochemistry,Bioengineering,Catalysis,Cell Biology,Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3