THE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES USED IN PHYSIOLOGY PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT

Author:

Lakshmikumari Ksh.1,N Sarada2,Kumar L Lalit3

Affiliation:

1. Senior Resident, Department of Physiology, RIMS

2. Prof, and Head of Department, Department of Physiology, RIMS

3. Senior Medical Ofcer, Manipur Health Services, Govt. of Manipur

Abstract

Background: A new competency-based medical undergraduate curriculum has been made by the National Medical Commission (NMC) initiating in 2019. Practical exercises which are application-oriented are recommended in this new curriculum among the Pre- and Para clinical subjects. In an attempt to improve the physiology practical assessment in our institution, and following the new competency-based medical curriculum, the spotting and clinical-based question assessment methods were introduced along with the other conventional assessment procedures like Hematology Practical, Graph and charts, and Clinical Examination in the rst year of the medical curriculum. The purposeAims and Objectives: of the present study was to see the relationship between the scores obtained by medical students in different methods during various evaluations in the rst year of medical college and to explore gender differences in student scores among the varied assessment program used in Physiology practical assessment. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 125 undergraduate medical students at the DepartmentMaterials and Methods: of Physiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal during the period between December 2021 to January 2022. Five different practical physiology assessment methods namely Hematology practical, Clinical examination, Graphs, and charts, spotting, and lastly clinical-based question assessment methods were used to determine the mean student scores. The data collected were entered into IBMStatistical Analysis: SPSS 26.0 version (IBM Inc. Armonk, NY, USA) and analysed using descriptive statistics. Statistical signicance was set at p-value<0.05. Results: 125 students (male 72, female 53) in the age range of 18 – 23 years participated in the study. The mean score of Graphs and Charts marks was the highest while students (12.26) scored lowest in the Clinical based question assessment method (9.31). The female students scored signicantly higher marks in spotting and clinical-based questions. There was a signicant variation in the marks obtained in differentConclusion: assessment techniques. The gender differences in the average scores were not signicant at conventional methods like haematology practical, graphs and charts, and clinical examination

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Reference14 articles.

1. Abraham RR, Raghavendra R, Surekha K, Asha K. A trial of the objective structured practical examination in physiology at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009; 33:21–23.

2. Leach L, Neutze G, Kepke N. Motivation in assessment. In: S Brown, S Armstrong, G Thompson, eds. Motivating Students. London: Kogan Page; 1998.

3. Nayar U, Malik SL, Bijlani RL. Objective structured practical examination: a new concept in assessment of laboratory exercises in preclinical sciences. Medical education. 1986 May;20(3):204-9.

4. NMC. Competency-Based Undergraduate Curriculum. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/UG-Curriculum-Vol-I.pdf. [Last accessed on 2022 January 30]

5. WHO COVID-2019 Situation Reports. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports. [Last accessed on 2022 January 30].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3