DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF FLATTENING FILTER-FREE BEAMS WITH THE FLATTENED BEAM OF 6 MV AND 10 MV PHOTON FOR VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY IN CERVIX CARCINOMA PLANS-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF FLATTENING FILTER-FREE BEAMS WITH THE FLATTENED BEAM OF 6 MV AND 10 MV PHOTON FOR VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY IN CERVIX CARCINOMA PLANS

Published:2022-12-01 Issue: Volume: Page:3-6
ISSN:
Container-title:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
language:en
Short-container-title:ijsr

Author:

J Kamalnath¹,Nigam Jitendra²,N S Silambarasan³,S Navitha⁴,Kumar Piyush⁵

Affiliation:

1. Intern Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP.

2. Assistant Professor cum Chief Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP.

3. Assistant Professor cum Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP

4. Assistant Professor cum Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP.

5. Professor and Head, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP

Abstract

Aim: To dosimetrically compare Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan of attening lter-free beam (FFF) and attened beam (FB) for 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams planned for cervix carcinoma cases. A total number of t Materials and Methods: hirty three cervix carcinoma cases treated in 2021 and 2022 were selected retrospectively. The VMAT plans were prepared using Eclipse™ 13.6v Treatment Planning System. Prescription used for planning was 50 Gy in 25 Fraction. 16 patients planned with 6MV and 6MV-FFF beam. Remaining 17 patients were planned with 10MV and 10MV-FFF beam. Two full arcs with no avoidance sector were used in all plans. For inverse planning optimization Progressive Resolution Optimizer (PRO) with 2.5 mm grid size used and for dose calculation, Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) was used. During optimization, dose objectives of PTV and OAR are kept constant between two plans. Priorities and NTO also maintained similar between two set of plans. Optimization and dose calculation steps are repeated sometimes to achieve clinically acceptable plan. The tools used to evaluate the plans are; Target Conformity Index (CI), Homogeneity Index (HI), dose to OARs, mean Normal tissue integral Dose (NTID), total monitor units (MUs) and Beam on Time (BOT) were analyzed. For statistical analysis, student t-test method was used. From the results it is observed that plans Result: created by FB and FFF beams are clinically acceptable. CI, HI in PTV coverage, normal tissue volume receiving low doses, MU and BOT are showing signicant results. Mean NTID is found to be signicant only in 10MV beams. FFF VMAT plans does not shows any signicant dosimetric differences over FB VMAT plans in terms of OAR mean dose in cervix carcinoma cases. However 10 MV-FB shows better rectum sparing than 10 MV-FFF. FB can be used for VMAT plans when conformity and homogeneity Conclusion: Index are concerned. FFF beams VMAT plan can be used for patient those who have chances of secondary malignancies since it reduces volume receiving low doses.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Subject

Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Communication,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Molecular Biology,Molecular Biology,Structural Biology,Catalysis,General Engineering,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Process Chemistry and Technology,Catalysis,Process Chemistry and Technology,Biochemistry,Bioengineering,Catalysis,Cell Biology,Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. Georg D, Knöös T, McClean B. Current status and future perspective of flattening filter free photon beams. Med Phys. 2011;38(3):1280–93.

2. Flattening filter free in intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) – Theoretical modeling with delivery efficiency analysis - Ma - 2019 - Medical Physics - Wiley Online Library [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 31]. Available from: https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.13267

3. Unflattened photon beams from the standard flattening filter free accelerators for radiotherapy: Advantages, limitations and challenges Sharma SD - J Med Phys [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2011;volume=36;issue=3;spage=123;epage=125;aulast=Sharma

4. Cashmore J. The characterization of unflattened photon beams from a 6 MV linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Apr 7;53(7):1933–46.

5. Sf K, U T, F P, On V, M S, M G, et al. Reduced neutron production through use of a flattening-filter-free accelerator. Int J RadiatOncolBiolPhys [Internet]. 2007 Jul 15 [cited 2022 Oct 31];68(4). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17637397/