A STUDY ON PATTERN OF BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA AND ITS OUTCOME FOLLOWING NON OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Author:

Karthik V Gowtham1,Mohideen Ibrahim G.M. Badhusha2,Baskaran R.3,Raja K.Karthick4,Raj Sachin5

Affiliation:

1. Final Year Post Graduate, Department of General Surgery, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India

2. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamlai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.

3. Professor, Chief And HOD, Department of General Surgery, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India

4. Associate Professor, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India

5. Assistant Professor, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abdomen is the third most commonly injured part of the body following injuries to extremities and head. Blunt injury remains to be the most prevailing mode of abdominal injury. Motor vehicle accidents are the most common mode to cause Blunt abdominal trauma. Evolving imaging modalities like FAST, CT scans have resulted in signicant shift from surgical to more selective conservative management of blunt injury abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of selected cases of Blunt injury abdomen managed in the Department of General Surgery in Rajah Muthiah Medical College and Hospital (RMMCH) during the period from September 2019 to October 2021. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The current study establishes the incidence and demographic distribution of patients who have sustained blunt abdominal trauma, also gives an outline which type of patient will benet conservative management and detects downfalls of surgical and conservative management and identies the causes of failure of Non operative management following blunt injury abdomen. RESULTS: In our study males were more commonly affected than females in the ratio 4:1 and age group involved ranging from 4 years to 69 years, majority were in second, third, fourth decades taking a toll of 71.25% of patients. The common presentations in these victims were abdominal pain, tenderness, diffuse guarding, rigidity, abdominal distention, sluggish/ absent bowel sounds, pallor, hypotension with features of shock. In unstable patients to detect hemoperitoneum, ultrasonography/FAST was a very helpful mode of investigation. But, it missed 3 cases with kidney injury, 5 cases with liver injury, and 9 cases with splenic injury. It is not an imaging of choice to detect bowel, kidney, pancreas and mesenteric injuries. CECT abdomen is the investigation of choice to grade the organ injuries. 37 patients with splenic injuries were identied by CT abdomen, of which 29 were managed conservatively. CT abdomen detected liver injuries in 21 patients, of which 16 were managed conservatively. Kidney injures were picked up in 5 patients with help of CT abdomen and all were subjected to conservative management. MANAGEMENT: From a total of 100 patients studied, 64 patients were selected for conservative management after initial resuscitation. Most common organ to get involved following Blunt abdominal trauma is Spleen (37%), followed by liver (21%), mesentery, small bowel and bladder. Out of 37 patients with splenic injuires, 29 were managed conservatively. 16 cases with isolated hepatic injury, 5 cases with kidney injury, 2 cases with bladder injury, 2 patients with mesenteric injury and one patient with pancreatic injury were managed conservatively. Morbidity and mortality: Mortality was not observed in patients subjected to conservative management. A total of 4 cases died in the operative group. Two patients due to pancreatic head transection, one due to associated head injury, one due to delayed hospitalization. The duration of hospitalization in patients who were managed conservatively ranged from 9-11 days and 14-20 days in patients who underwent surgery. One patient developed pseudocyst of pancreas following pancreatic injury and another patient developed clot retention following conservative management for bladder injury. The causes of failure of non operative management in patients with blunt abdominal trauma were patients with pancreatic head transection, ongoing hemorrhage/ features of peritonitis with hemoperitoneum and hollow viscus perforation. CONCLUSION: The success rates following conservative management of solid organ injures after blunt injury abdomen have been increasing and it is quite challenging also, since it requires close observation by experienced surgeon and there is a narrow line to choose the line of management (conservative / surgical) for better outcome. Involvement of multiple intra abdominal organs, other associated extra abdominal injuries, coexisting comorbid diseases and late presentation following injury increases the morbidity and mortality. Ultimately early diagnosis, aggressive adequate resuscitation and timely surgical intervention when needed in severely injured patients may boost the outcome in these patients who have failed conservative management.

Publisher

World Wide Journals

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Linguistics and Language,Education,Language and Linguistics,Cognitive Neuroscience,Linguistics and Language,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Language and Linguistics,Linguistics and Language,Education,Language and Linguistics,Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies,Linguistics and Language,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Plant Science

Reference34 articles.

1. Bailey and Love’s Short practice of surgery 27th edition page 310 to 424.

2. Gackowski W, Najninigier B et ai, Treatment of liver injuries in personal clinical material from 1990-1996, 1997; Su Ipt 2; 223-7

3. OPUS 12 Scientist 2007 Vol. 1, No. 1 S.P. Stawicki Trends in non operative management of traumatic injuries.

4. Wilson RF, Walt AJ. Et ai, Injury to stomach and small bowel-EDS Management of trauma, Pitfalls & Practice.1996; 497-509 (Motz 1890)

5. Ruddock et al 1937, Rao, Ivatury, Louis F. Zantat, Surg. CN.A.M.1291, 796, 1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3